1Université Nangui Abrogoua, UFR-SN, Unité de Recherche en Entomologie Agricole du Pôle Production Végétale, 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
2Université Nangui Abrogoua, UFR-SN, Unité de Recherche en Entomologie Agricole du Pôle Production Végétale, 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
3Université Nangui Abrogoua, UFR-SN, Unité de Recherche en Entomologie Agricole du Pôle Production Végétale, 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
4✉ CBGP, Institut Agro Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
2025 - Volume: 65 Issue: 1 pages: 3-35
https://doi.org/10.24349/yk4c-l3jbMites of the family Phytoseiidae are predatory species that feed on phytophagous mites and small insects such as thrips and whiteflies on both commercial plants and the endemic vegetation. Several species serve as biological control agents for the control of pest organisms in open field and protected crops worldwide (McMurtry and Croft 1997; McMurtry et al. 2013; Knapp et al. 2018). This family is widespread worldwide, present on all continents except Antarctica, and consists of about 2,500 valid species in 94 genera and three subfamilies (Demite et al. 2024). Biodiversity surveys in poorly investigated areas is still an urgent need, as they may lead to the discovery of additional species potentially useful for biological control, while also enhancing our understanding of biodiversity in these areas (Kreiter et al. 2018a, b, c, 2020a, b, c, 2021; Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf 2020a, b). From this perspective, areas with high biodiversity levels are particularly promising. Most of the African intertropical region constitutes one of the highest world biodiversity hotspots, a concept defined by Myers (1988) to identify regions of critical importance for biodiversity conservation. The common characteristics of these hotspots is their high levels of endemism, combined with the loss of at least 70% of their original natural vegetation (Myers et al. 2000). Knowledge of the phytoseiid diversity in these high interest areas is especially important in the context of global climate change, as it may help identify potential biological control agents (BCA) and support the future establishment of conservation programs.
Ivory Coast is an agricultural country where agriculture plays a crucial role in the national economy, contributing to one-third of the Gross Domestic Product (Gnago et al. 2010). In addition, in order to export crops such as coffee and cocoa, there are booming fruit crops such as papaya (Carica papaya L., Caricaceae). Papaya cultivation is more practiced in the southern and central regions of the country and has expanded significantly due to the Agricultural Export Promotion and Diversification Project (PPDEA). However, papaya production faces substantial challenges due to pressure from various pests, including phytophagous mites, which cause severe damage in papaya orchards. Biological control of these phytophagous mites required the use of predatory arthropods including mites of the family Phytoseiidae. Indeed, almost all species in this family are considered potential biological control agents (BCA) of mites and small phytophagous insects (McMurtry and Croft 1997; McMurtry et al. 2013).
Despite nearly 60 years of faunal studies conducted worldwide to search for phytoseiid species, many areas remain minimally explored or completely unexplored (Kreiter et al. 2020a, b, c, d). In Ivory Coast, very few surveys have focused on phytoseiids. Ragusa and Athias-Henriot (1983) recorded Amblyseius masiaka (Blommers & Chazeau, 1974), A. usitatus = N. usitatus (Van der Merwe), and Neoseiulus erugatus Ragusa and Athias-Henriot from soil samples. Athias-Henriot (1977) described N. lamticus (Athias-Henriot) from the Lamto region, in central Ivory Coast. Twenty kilometres from Yopougon, in the capital of Ivory Coast, Zannou et al. (2007) identified the species Amblyseius sundi Pritchard & Baker on Eucommia ulmoides Oliver (Eucommiaceae). Finally, Moraes et al. (1989a) recorded the species A. largoensis Muma. It should be noted that Amblyseius masiaka and N. usitatus are both junior synonyms of Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes (Ueckermann and Loots, 1988). Consequently, five species are currently recorded from Ivory Coast: N. barkeri, N. erugatus, N. lamticus, A. masiaka and A. sundi.
These results indicate that few studies have been carried out on the fauna of Phytoseiidae in Ivory Coast. This study was therefore carried out during years 2017 and 2018 on Carica papaya L. in order to contribute to a better knowledge of Phytoseiidae mites for biological control of crop pests in Ivory Coast. Here, we present the faunistic results.
The sampling of Phytoseiidae mites was conducted from 14/III/2017 to 17/IV/2018, as a part of the PhD thesis of the senior author (M. Touré) in Ivory Coast. The study covered three areas: Anyama, Yobouekro, and NGattakro, located in the departments of Abidjan, Toumodi, and Yamoussoukro, respectively. The average annual temperature and rainfall in these areas are 153.34 mm and 27.64 °C, 103.76 mm and 26.41 °C and 97.44 mm and 26.41 °C, respectively.
The sampling consisted of collecting papaya leaves from orchards at the different sites. The papaya leaves were cut, placed in transparent plastic bags, and transported to the laboratory for processing. Mites were collected from the papaya leaves using a binocular microscope. To facilitate observation under the microscope, the papaya leaves were cut into smaller lobes. A small brush soaked in alcohol was used to collect the mites, which were then transferred into microtubes containing 70% ethanol. These microtubes were labeled with information such as the date, collection area, plot, and sample block number.
The mites were mounted between the slide and coverslip using Hoyer's fluid (Walter and Krantz 2009). Slides were placed in an oven at 45 °C and subsequently sealed with a durable nail polish to ensure long-term preservation.
Chant and McMurtry's (1994, 2007) concepts of the taxonomy of the family Phytoseiidae for identification and the world catalogue database of Demite et al. (2014, 2024) for distribution and information on descriptions and re-descriptions were used. World distribution indicated for each species is the world distribution prior to this study.
The setal nomenclature system adopted was that of Lindquist & Evans (1965) and Lindquist (1994) as adapted by Rowell et al. (1978) and Chant & Yoshida-Shaul (1989) for the dorsal surface and by Chant & Yoshida-Shaul (1991) for the ventral surface. Pore (= solenostome) and poroid (= lyrifissure) notations are that of Athias-Henriot (1975).
Macrosetal notation (Sge = genual macroseta; Sti = tibial macroseta; St = tarsal macroseta, numbered I to IV depending on the position on legs I, II, III or IV) are that of Muma and Denmark (1970). Numbers of teeth on the fixed and movable cheliceral digits do not include the respective apical teeth. Setae not referred to in the Results section should be considered as absent. Type of spermatheca or insemination apparatus are that of Denmark and Evans (2011). All species recorded are measured and data mentioned in the literature for those species are provided in this paper. All measurements are given in micrometres (µm) and presented with the mean in bold followed by the range in parenthesis.
Classification of plants follows the APG IV classification of 2016 (ex. Byng et al. 2018). Specimens of each species are deposited in the mite collections of Montpellier SupAgro conserved in UMR CBGP INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Institut Agro/University of Montpellier.
The following abbreviations are used in this paper for morphological characters (Table 1 to 19) in addition to macrosetal notation (see above): dsl = dorsal shield length just above j1 to just below J5 in the middle line; dsw s4 = dorsal shield width at the level of s4; dsw R1 = dorsal shield width at the level of R1; gensl = genital shield length; gensw st5 = genital shield width at level of steae st5; gensw post. corn. = genital shield width at level of posterior corners; lisl = primary or largest inguinal sigilla (= ''metapodal plate″) length; lisw = primary or largest inguinal sigilla (= ''metapodal plate″) width; sisl = secondary or shortest inguinal sigilla (= ''metapodal plate″) length; sisw = secondary or shortest inguinal sigilla (= ''metapodal plate″) width; vsl = ventrianal (or ventral for Iphiseius degenerans) shield length; asl = anal shield length; ; gv3 – gv3 = distance between centers of solenostomes gv3 on the ventrianal shield; vsw ant. corn. & vsw anus = ventrianal shield width at anterior corners level and at paranal setae level; asw = anal shield width; scl: calyx total length; scw = calyx widest width; fdl = fixed digit length; mdl = movable digit length; No teeth Fd = number of teeth on the fixed digit; No teeth Md = number of teeth on the movable digit; shaft = length of the shaft of spermatodactyl; branch = length of the toe; BCA = Biological control agent; aasl = altitude above sea level.
The following abbreviations are used in this paper for institutions: CBGP = Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations; CIRAD = Centre International de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement; IA = Institut Agro; INRAE = Institut National de Recherche pour l′Agriculture, l′Alimentation et l′Environnement; IRD = Institut de Recherche pour le Développement; UMR = Unité Mixte de Recherche.
We collected 12 species, 11 of which are new records for Ivory Coast.
All recorded species belong to the subfamily Amblyseiinae, with no representatives of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae found on the papaya plant.
The species recorded belong to three Amblyseiinae tribes: Neoseiulini, Amblyseiini, Euseiini, and to five genera: Neoseiulus (2 species), Amblyseius (3 species), Proprioseiopsis (2 species), Iphiseius (1 species) and Euseius (4 species).
In this paper, we present taxonomical information, measurements, world distribution, list of field collections and general information (when available) on these twelve species: Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans), N. teke Pritchard & Baker, Amblyseius sundi Pritchard & Baker, A. swirskii Athias-Henriot, A. tamatavensis Blommers, Proprioseiopsis mexicanus (Garman), P. ovatus (Garman), Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese), Euseius fustis (Pritchard & Baker), E. lokele (Pritchard & Baker), E. nyalensis (El-Badry), and E. ovaloides (Blommers).
Neoseiulus Hughes, 1948: 141
Typhlodromus longispinosus Evans 1952: 413; Evans 1953: 465; Womersley 1954: 177; Ehara 1958: 55.
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) longispinosus, Chant 1959: 74.
Amblyseius longispinosus, Corpuz & Rimando 1966: 129; Schicha 1975: 103.
Neoseiulus longispinosus, Moraes et al. 1986: 85; 2000: 245; Chant & McMurtry 2003: 37; Moraes et al. 2004b: 129; Chant and McMurtry 2007: 29.
This species belongs to the barkeri species group and to the womersleyi species subgroup, as the calyx is markedly constricted at the junction with the atrium, the atrium is deeply forked at the junction with the major duct, and the major duct, atrium, and calyx are not of the same width (Chant and McMurtry 2003).
This species is widely distributed in many countries of the world, mainly in tropical areas (Moraeset al. 2000; Mailloux et al. 2010; Kreiter et al. 2013, 2018 a, c; Demite et al. 2024). It was found rarely in surveys made in Guadeloupe, Martinique and La Réunion, except in studies on companion plants in citrus orchards (Mailloux et al. 2010; Kreiter et al. 2013, 2018c; Le Bellec et al., unpub. data). The species seems to be more common on weeds with populations of tetranychid mites. Neoseiulus longispinosus, a type II phytoseiid predatory mite, like N. californicus (McMurtry et al. 2013), has received increasing attention in Asia since 2010 for the control of different spider mites (of genera Eutetranychus, Oligonychus, and Tetranychus) (Nusartlert et al. 2011). The feeding, development, predation, cannibalism, intra-guild predation and behaviour have been extensively studied by several authors (see for exampleLuong et al. 2017) for pest control purposes. Neoseiulus longispinosus is well-known as a BCAused in many countries worldwide for spider mite management. A recent study by Huyen et al. (2017) have shown that, at least in controlled laboratory conditions, N. longispinosus is apotential biological control agent against the citrus red mite, P. citri.
Tetranychus urticae is a major pest of papaya in south Florida, where Neoseiulus longispinosus, a newly naturalized predator, has become the most abundant predator associated with this pest. Single releases of N. longispinosus significantly suppressed TSSM populations. That study demonstrated that N. longispinosus has the potential to control TSSM on papaya, but the level of control can be negatively affected by high levels of cannibalism at low prey densities, as well as intraguild predation by aggressive intraguild predators, like A. swirskii (Döker et al. 2021).
This is the first record of this species in Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 45 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W), on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Australia, China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Yunnan), Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Grande Comore Island (Comoros), Guadeloupe Island (France), Hawaii, Hong Kong, India (Andaman Islands, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar Pradesh, Kerala, Orissa, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh), Indonesia, Japan, Les Saintes Islands (France), Malaysia, Marie-Galante Island (France), Martinique (France), New Zealand, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, La Réunion Island (France), Rodrigues Island (Mauritius), Russia (Primorsky Territory), Saint-Barthélémy Island (France), South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, USA (Florida), Vietnam.
Remarks — The measurements of the female and male specimens from Ivory Coast (Table 1 and 2) overlap with those obtained from populations in various countries. These measurements are close to those obtained for specimens from FCI and La Réunion Island.
Download as Sources of measurements – Grande Comore: Kreiter et al.(2018b) (a mistake remains in this paper, 1 single female measured instead of 8 as indicated); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Sri Lanka: Moraes et al.(2004a); Indonesia Holotype: Schicha (1975); Taïwan: Tseng (1983); Thailand: Oliveira et al.(2012); FCI (French Caribbean Islands): Moraes et al.(2000); Martinique: Kreiter et al.(2018c); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (10) (this study)
Grande Comore (1)
La Réunion (18)
Sri Lanka (3)
Indonesia Holotype (1)
Taiwan (?)
Thailand (3)
FCI (7)
Martinique (8)
dsl
335 (300–352)
380
320 (278–348)
321 (313–338)
332
–
330 (315–340)
332 (308–398)
321 (295–340)
dsw s4
176 (150–195)
192
183 (150–205)
187 (175–208)
173
–
186 (178–195)
179 (154–200)
168 (150–183)
dsw R1
180 (170–198)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
18 (13–22)
20
18 (15–20)
18 (17–19)
14
17
19 (18–21)
18 (16–22)
16 (13–18)
j3
61 (58–65)
69
62 (53–73)
62 (61–64)
51
58
61 (56–68)
59 (52–64)
58 (48–63)
j4
59 (53–63)
70
55 (48–60)
58 (56–60)
49
59
58 (54–62)
59 (52–65)
56 (50–65)
j5
70 (65–75)
78
66 (58–73)
70 (69–71)
59
–
69 (65–72)
69 (64–75)
66 (60–73)
j6
73 (65-79)
78
73 (65–83)
70 (68–72)
64
–
71 (68–73)
72 (68–75)
68 (60–83)
J2
74 (66–81)
88
74 (68–83)
77 (75–79)
66
–
74 (68–81)
76 (73–78)
76 (68–88)
J5
9 (8–10)
10
8 (6–10)
8
10
–
9 (7–12)
9 (8–11)
9 (8–10)
r3
58 (55–65)
75
59 (48–78)
55 (55–56)
54
–
61 (50– 67)
57 (49–62)
54 (45–63)
R1
60 (55–65)
70
61 (54–80)
60 (59–62)
58
–
63 (55–70)
61 (57–65)
57 (50–63)
s4
83 (80–90)
–
82 (70–88)
82 (80–83)
75
72
81 (76–85)
77 (73–80)
78 (73–88)
S2
80 (73–90)
88
75 (68–85)
73 (70–79)
67
70
73 (68–80)
72 (68–76)
69 (63–76)
S4
54 (48–58)
63
56 (43–68)
59 (57–62)
49
58
61 (56–68)
57 (48–76)
52 (45–58)
S5
18 (14–20)
18
17 (15–18)
21 (19–23)
15
17
20 (18–25)
16 (14–16)
14 (13–15)
z2
68 (63–73)
75
67 (56–75)
69 (68–70)
58
62
66 (62–70)
65 (62–68)
64 (58–70)
z4
71 (65–83)
78
73 (65–80)
73 (73–75)
58
65
71 (68–75)
69 (67–73)
70 (63–87)
z5
31 (28–35)
38
27 (23–33)
32 (32–38)
–
–
31 (25–36)
35 (32–40)
31 (28–35)
Z1
76 (73–80)
83
75 (65–85)
77 (76–78)
67
–
75 (71–78)
75 (72–80)
74 (68–80)
Z4
72 (68–75)
78
70 (63–75)
72 (71–73)
68
65
71 (65–76)
71 (67–75)
69 (63–78)
Z5
78 (71–89)
85
81 (73–88)
80 (80–81)
72
70
78 (72–81)
80 (78–81)
77 (65–80)
st1-st1
49 (45–55)
48
47 (43–50)
–
–
–
–
–
46 (45–50)
st2-st2
57 (53–60)
55
58 (55–60)
53 (50–55)
–
–
59 (57–60)
55 (49–57)
54 (53–55)
st3-st3
72 (68–75)
60
71 (68–78)
–
77
–
–
60 (59–62)
58 (55–60)
st1-st3
55 (53–58)
73
57 (55–60)
55 (53–56)
62
–
63 (57–85)
–
70 (68–73)
st4-st4
79 (73–93)
85
71 (63–83)
–
–
–
–
–
72 (63–88)
gensl
117 (113–120)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
58 (55–60)
58
54 (50–58)
53 (51–54)
–
–
61 (55–64)
56 (52–60)
53 (50–63)
gensw post. corn.
71 (65–75)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
26 (23–30)
23
25 (20–30)
–
–
–
–
–
28 (23–33)
lisw
5 (3–6)
3
3 (3–6)
–
–
–
–
–
3
sisl
15 (13–18)
18
12 (10–18)
–
–
–
–
–
13 (10–15)
sisw
2 (1–3)
vsl
112 (105–120)
125
114 (93–125)
106 (103–111)
97
–
123 (120–125)
115 (94–121)
111 (103–120)
vsw ant. corn.
87 (80–93)
90
86 (80–95)
91 (89–93)
87
–
97 (95–100)
86 (80–92)
84 (75–90)
vsw anus
77 (73–83)
78
69 (67–73)
75 (73–77)
–
–
–
75 (67–83)
70 (65–75)
gv3-gv3
25 (23–28)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
62 (58–65)
73
62 (55–70)
–
–
–
–
–
60 (55–63)
scl
20 (18–23)
25
24 (13–35)
21 (20–21)
30
–
–
28 (25–30)
20 (17–25)
scw
5 (4–6)
5
4 (3–10)
–
4
–
–
–
–
StIV
82 (75–88)
75
79 (75–83)
68 (68–70)
80–87
74
74 (72–77)
80 (75–87)
81 (75–88)
fdl, No teeth
24 (23–26), 4
23
24 (19–28), 6
22 (21–22), 5
–
–
23 (22–25)
25 (22–27), 4–5
24 (23–25), 4
mdl, No teeth
24 (24–26), 2
23
24 (23–30), 2
25 (23–25), 2
–, 2
–
26 (25–27)
25 (23–25), 2
24 (23–25), 2
Download as Sources of measurements – La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); FCI (French Caribbean Islands): Moraes et al. (2000); Indonesia Paratype: Schicha (1975); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
La Réunion (1)
F.C.I. (5)
Indonesia Paratype (1)
dsl
250
248
247 (224–269)
231
dsw s4
158
170
160 (136–173)
138
dsw R1
166
–
–
–
j1
25
15
14 (13–16)
9
j3
47
50
44 (40–48)
43
j4
37
45
43 (42–43)
39
j5
45
48
52 (50–53)
43
j6
53
53
52 (50–53)
46
J2
53
55
56 (53–61)
54
J5
8
8
6 (5–6)
2
r3
33
35
32 (24–40)
32
R1
33
38
34 (32–37)
32
s4
60
63
62 (59–66)
57
S2
50
55
52 (50–54)
46
S4
27
40
30 (29–32)
22
S5
13
15
14 (13–16)
14
z2
45
48
44 (35–48)
45
z4
50
50
52 (48–54)
49
z5
30
28
27 (24–32)
–
Z1
45
55
56 (50–58)
46
Z4
50
53
55 (48–59)
45
Z5
53
58
57 (56–59)
57
st1-st1
45
43
–
–
st2-st2
50
53
–
–
st3-st3
55
53
–
–
st4-st4
45
103
–
–
st1-st5
100
43
–
–
st5-st5
38
35
–
–
vsl
113
100
106 (99–112)
101
vsw ant. corn.
145
130
135 (125–144)
130
vsw anus
73
65
–
–
gv3-gv3
15
–
–
–
JV5
30
35
–
–
StIV
55
60
66 (62–72)
–
fdl, No teeth
18, ?
18
–
–
mdl, No teeth
18, ?
18
–
–
shaft
15
15
12 (11–14)
21
branch
15
–
–
–
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke Pritchard & Baker 1962: 239.
Amblyseius teke, Meyer & Rodrigues 1966: 30; Moraes et al. 1989a: 83; Moraes et al. 1989b: 97.
Neoseiulus teke, Moraes et al. 1986: 98; Chant & McMurtry 2003: 37; Moraes et al. 2004b:147; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 31.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) bibens Blommers 1973: 111 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Like N. longispinosus, N. teke belongs to the barkeri species group and to the womersleyi species subgroup (see above) (Chant and McMurtry 2003).
This species is found in sub-Saharan Africa often associated with Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar), the cassava green mite (CGM). It has been studied for its potential as BCA against the CGM. Nwilene and Nachman (1996) studied its reproduction characteristics on M. tanajoa.
It was more efficient than Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) but seems not efficient enough in field conditions (Nwilene and Nachman 1996). Quilici et al. (2000) and Kreiter et al. (2020c) have collected this specieson La Réunion Island. Measurements of specimens collected during this study are provided in table 3. This is the first record of that species for Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single specimen (1 ♀) collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W), on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Burundi, DR Congo, Ghana, Grande Comore Island (Comoros), Kenya, Madeira Island (Portugal), Malawi, Mayotte Island (France), Mohéli Island (Comoros), Mozambique, La Réunion Island (France), Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe.
Remarks — The measurements of morphological characters for the single N. teke female specimen from Ivory Coast (Table 3) are very close to those of specimens from neighbouring countries, especially from various African countries and La Réunion. However, they differ from the holotype from Congo (Zannou et al. 2006) and specimens from South Africa, which are larger (van der Merwe 1965).
As this species is a potential BCA, and as it is very difficult to obtain type specimens from Museum for old described species, it would be very important to undertake molecular studies and / or crossbreeding experiments with population collected in the field to determine whether all specimens of this various countries / locations belong to the same species or represent several different cryptic species.
Download as Sources of measurements – Congo Holotype: Zannou et al. (2006); Kenya: El-Banhawy & Knapp (2011); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Mayotte: Kreiter et al. (2020a); Madagascar (Identified as Amblyseius bibens but synonymized by Ueckermann & Loots 1988): Blommers (1973); South Africa: van der Merwe (1968); Other African countries (Burundi 1♀, Ghana 2♀♀, Kenya 3♀♀, Malawi 1♀, Mozambique 1♀, Rwanda 1♀, Sierra Leone 1♀): Zannou et al. (2006); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Congo Holotype (1)
Kenya (2)
La Réunion (10)
Mayotte (3)
Madagascar (1)
South Africa (5)
Other African countries (10)
dsl
330
348
295
307 (293–328)
305–323
340
332–341
308 (293–320)
dsw s4
152
–
160
165 (155–173)
170–183
200
190–203
172 (162–186)
dsw R1
170
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
18
–
18
15 (13–18)
18–19
20
19–23
18 (16–19)
j3
50
61
39
46 (38–53)
55
50
62–67
44 (35–50)
j4
30
42
39
25 (23–28)
30–33
30
38–45
30 (23–36)
j5
43
–
39
39 (35–43)
47–48
45
47–54
42 (35–48)
j6
47
60
42
47 (45–53)
55
54
62–66
48 (43–53)
J2
55
68
48
55 (50–58)
62–63
65
68–75
53 (45–59)
J5
10
–
9
11 (10–13)
10–13
10
12–14
11 (10–12)
r3
38
61
37
44 (40–48)
47–50
50
54–66
40 (34–46)
R1
33
66
37
42 (40–45)
48–40
48
54–66
37 (27–48)
s4
63
71
55
60 (55–65)
64–65
66
75–82
60 (54–64)
S2
63
–
58
64 (60–68)
68–71
70
72–80
61 (56–67)
S4
38
–
39
47 (43–60)
51–55
50
56–63
43 (40–48)
S5
38
48
34
36 (28–38)
45–48
40
46–52
32 (23–40)
z2
53
62
46
51 (48–53)
58
56
66–71
49 (41–54)
z4
55
65
48
50 (48–50)
56–58
54
68–75
51 (43–56)
z5
27
42
35
25 (23–28)
35–38
25
33–44
29 (19–38)
Z1
58
65
44
54 (50–58)
60–63
55
71–77
53 (45–62)
Z4
63
–
55
57 (50–63)
65–68
66
66–74
60 (54–67)
Z5
65
–
58
68 (65–73)
70–78
76
80–90
65 (59–74)
st1-st1
50
–
– **
44 (43–48)
45
–
–
–
st2-st2
65
–
53
55 (53–58)
54–56
–
–
58 (56–63)
st3-st3
80
–
– **
67 (61–70)
68–69
–
63–67
–
st1-st3
53
–
53
60 (55–63)
60
–
56–59
56 (53–58)
st4-st4
?
–
– **
66 (53–70)
61–63
–
–
–
gensl
100
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
gensw st5
53
–
58
54 (50–58)
56–60
–
70–74
56 (51–63)
gensw post. corn.
70
–
–
–
64–73
–
–
–
lisl
23
–
–
25 (23–28)
23–27
–
–
–
lisw
3
–
–
3 (3–5)
2–4
–
–
–
sisl
10
–
–
10 (8–10)
10–13
–
–
–
sisw
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
?
108
105
109 (100–115)
115–125
125
115–122
111 (104–118)
vsw ZV2
?
95
80
90 (83–95)
95–103
100
95–100
97 (93–102)
vsw anus
?
–
–
71 (63–80)
75
–
–
–
gv3 – gv3
20
–
–
–
20–23
–
–
–
JV5
43
–
55
57 (55–63)
68
64
66–72
–
scl
8
–
16
25 (23–28)
25–30
24
27
24 (22–27)
scw
3
–
–
6 (5–13)
5
7
–
–
StIV
63
72
65
69 (48–75)
63–65
75
75–78
66 (51–77)
fdl, No teeth
23, ?
–
–, 7
24 (18–25), 4
23–25, 4
24, 3
24, 4
24 (23–25), 4
mdl, No teeth
23, 3
–
–, 2
24 (20–28), 2
26–28, 2
26, 2
27, 2
26 (25–27), 2
Amblyseiina Muma, 1961: 69.
Amblyseius Berlese, 1914: 143.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) sundi Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 244.
Amblyseius sundi, Moraes et al. 1989a: 97; Chant &McMurtry 2004: 212; Moraes et al. 2004b: 52.
Amblyseius (Proprioseiopsis) sundi, Matthysse & Denmark, 1981: 344.
Amblyseius sundi belongs to the sundi species group and the sundi species subgroup. This species has already been recorded from the Ivory Coast. Blommers (1976) observed some Tetranychus neocaledonicus André and Brevipalpus sp. on the lemon trees on which this species was collected. But the biology of this species remain unknown.
Specimens examined — a single specimen (1 ♀) collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W), on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Congo, Cuba, DR Congo, Ghana, Guadeloupe Island (France), Ivory Coast, Kenya, Madagascar Island, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Zimbabwe.
Remarks — The measurements of the single specimen collected are very close to those of specimens from other African countries (Table 4).
Download as Sources of measurements – DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) Holotype: Pritchard & Baker (1962) in Zannou et al. (2007); Nigeria1: Matthysse & Denmak (1981); Nigeria2: Moraes et al. (1989b); Other African Countries (Burundi 1♀, Ghana 3♀♀, Ivory Coast 1♀, Kenya 4♀♀, Malawi 1♀, Rwanda 2♀♀, Sierra Leone 1♀, Uganda 1♀): Zannou et al. (2007); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
DRC (1) Holotype
Nigeria1 (1)
Nigeria2 (1)
Other African Countries (14)
dsl
338
348
377
360
373 (318–421)
dsw s4
238
266
212
240
272 (248–304)
dsw R1
233
–
–
–
–
j1
38
37
36
38
39 (32–45)
j3
45
50
44
44
48 (40–56)
j4
5
2
5
2
5 (4–5)
j5
5
2
5
2
4 (3–5)
j6
5
4
5
2
6 (5–8)
J2
5
5
5
2
6 (5–8)
J5
5
6
5
5
7 (6–8)
r3
18
13
16
10
14 (10–16)
R1
8
8
5
7
8 (5–11)
s4
165
158
152
137
165 (133–206)
S2
5
8
6
5
7 (5–8)
S4
5
6
6
5
7 (6–8)
S5
4
6
6
5
6 (5–8)
z2
5
8
5
7
7 (5–8)
z4
5
6
5
7
7 (5–14)
z5
8
4
5
5
5 (4–5)
Z4
163
174
165
168
172 (144–208)
Z5
385
450
426
394
445 (366–547)
st1-st1
68
–
–
–
–
st2-st2
78
78
–
–
79 (73–88)
st3-st3
83
–
–
–
–
st1-st3
69
66
–
–
69 (62–82)
st4-st4
85
–
–
–
–
gensl
123
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
75
78
–
–
78 (72–85)
gensw post. corn.
73
–
–
–
–
lisl
30
–
–
–
–
lisw
3
–
–
–
–
sisl
18
–
–
–
–
sisw
1
–
–
–
–
vsl
118
126
–
120
122 (100–141)
vsw ant. corn.
65
70
–
60
73 (64–85)
vsw anus
78
79
–
72
80 (69–91)
gv3 – gv3
28
–
–
–
–
JV5
?
–
–
–
–
scl
38
31
–
36
40 (34–48)
scw
4
–
–
–
–
SgeI
73
72
–
36
74 (61–96)
SgeII
45
48
–
48
49 (40–59)
SgeIII
63
66
–
66
72 (50–88)
StiIII
45
53
–
53
56 (43–67)
StIII
38
–
–
–
–
SgeIV
175
186
190
156
209 (157–270)
StiIV
125
134
137
120
156 (112–208)
StIV
87
85
92
84
99 (69–141)
fdl, No teeth
35, 13
34, 12–13
–
36
34 (33–36), 13–14
mdl, No teeth
38, 3
36
–
36
38 (37–39), 3
Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot, 1962: 5; Swirski et al. 1998: 102; Chant & McMurtry 2004: 201.
Typhlodromips swirskii, Moraes et al. 2004b: 227.
Typhlodromips capsicum Basha, Youssef, Ibrahim & Mostafa 2001: 372 (synonymy according to Abo-Shnaf & Moraes 2014).
Amblyseius enab El-Badry 1967: 178 (synonymy according to Abo-Shnaf & Moraes 2014).
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) rykei Pritchard & Baker 1962: 249 (synonymy according to Zannou et al. 2007).
Amblyseius swirskii belongs to the obtusus species group, characterized by the presence of setae J2 and Z1, setae z4 are minute and a female ventrianal shield is neither vase-shaped nor divided. Within this group, it belongs to andersoni species subgroup (120 species), as its spermatheca has a cup-shaped calyx. The predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot, 1962 (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is one of the most efficient predators; it is currently released in more than 50 countries of the world. Originally described in 1962 from almond (Prunus amygdalus [Miller] D.A. Webb) in Bet Dagan, Israel, by Athias-Henriot. The species was reported along the coast of Israel, in the Middle East, Southern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Americas (Demite et al. 2024).
This species is able to develop not only in the Mediterranean basin but also in subtropical and tropical areas (Zannou and Hanna 2011). Since it does not enter diapause, it is suitable for use throughout much of the growing season in regions where daytime temperatures regularly exceed 22 °C (Calvo et al. 2015). Amblyseius swirskii is commonly used to control whiteflies and thrips in greenhouse vegetables (especially cucumber, pepper and eggplant) and some ornamental crops, in Europe and North America (Calvo et al. 2015). The biology of this species and its importance for biocontrol were comprehensively reviewed by Calvo et al. (2015) and Buitenhuis et al. (2015). In 2015, a species ressembling to A. swirskii was discovered after a thrips outbreak on peppers and roses on La Réunion Island (Kreiter et al. 2016a, b), located thousands of kilometres from its supposed native area. Morphological and molecular analysis confirmed its identity as A. swirskii (Kreiter et al. 2016a, b). This is the first record of this species from Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 7 ♀♀ collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W), 3 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ collected between 05/IV/2017 and 17/IV/2018 in Toumodi, Yobouekro (aasl 184 m, Lat 6°31′19.196″N, Long 5°6′41.36″W) and 32 ♀♀ collected between 06/04/2017 au 18/03/2018 in Yamoussoukro, Ngattakro (aasl 158 m, Lat 6°49′39.443″N, Long 5°17′21.635″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Argentina, Azerbaijan, Benin, Burundi, Cape Verde, DR Congo, Egypt, Gaza Strip, Georgia, Ghana, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Reunion Island, Saudi Aarabia, Senegal, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tanzania, Türkiye, USA (California and Florida), Yemen.
Remarks — The measurement values (Tables 5 and 6) are very close to those reported in the literature, especially for specimens from Africa.
Download as Sources of measurements – Cape Verde: Ueckermann (1992); Egypt: Abo-Shnaf & Moraes (2014); Other African Countries (Benin: 2♀♀; Burundi: 1♀; Ghana: 4♀♀; Democratic Republic of Congo: holotype of A. (A.) rykei); Israel: 2♀♀; : Zannou et al.* (2007); Israel: Athias-Henriot (1962); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2016a); Spain: Ferragut et al.(2010); Türkiye: Döker et al. (2020); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (10) (this study)
Cape Verde (16)
Egypt (8)
Other African Countries (10)
La Réunion (10)
Israel (5)
Spain (?)
Türkiye (5)
dsl
347 (325–395)
347–408
375 (358–397)
338 (326–352)
384 (368–400)
–
345–370
342 (335–350)
dsw s4
197 (180–213)
211–246
214 (195–224)
205 (202–208)
233 (205–245)
–
188–202
169 (165–175)
dsw R1
208 (195–225)
–
–
–
–
–
–
212 (200–230)
j1
31 (28–35)
31–39
30 (25–32)
29 (24–32)
29 (25–31)
29 (25–32)
24–28
29 (24–32)
j3
54 (50–58)
57–69
55 (52–57)
53 (48–56)
53 (50–58)
51 (46–57)
56
53 (50–57)
j4
8
8–9
10 (9–15)
8
8 (8–10)
–
9
10 (9–10)
j5
8
8–9
9 (8–10)
8
8
–
8
10 (9–10)
j6
8 (8–10)
9–11
10 (9–11)
9 (8–10)
8 (8–10)
–
8
9 (8–10)
J2
9 (8–10)
9–11
9 (8–10)
9 (8–10)
8
8 (7–9)
8
10 (9–10)
J5
8 (8–9)
9–11
10 (8–10)
7 (6–8)
10 (8–10)
‐
8
10 (9–10)
r3
23 (20–25)
23
25 (23–27)
20 (19–21)
24 (23–25)
–
22–25
25 (25–26)
R1
13 (10–15)
12–15
15 (12–17)
11 (10–13)
15 (13–17)
–
14–16
17 (15–20)
s4
77 (73–83)
74–85
78 (72–81)
75 (70–82)
83 (78–100)
76 (70–81)
76–80
78 (75–80)
S2
13 (11–13)
15–20
19 (18–21)
13 (11–14)
18 (17–22)
19 (17–25)
16–22
15 (14–16)
S4
9 (8–10)
9–11
11 (8–13)
9 (8–10)
11 (10–12)
12 (10–14)
12–14
12 (10–13)
S5
8 (8–9)
9–11
11 (9–12)
7 (6–8)
10 (10–11)
–
10–12
10 (8–11)
z2
11 (8–13)
12–15
14 (11–16)
12 (11–16)
15 (13–15)
15 (13–20)
16
15 (12–17)
z4
12 (10–15)
12–15
15 (12–18)
13 (10–16)
15 (15–17)
17 (15–26)
16–22
14 (12–16)
z5
8 (8–9)
8–9
8 (7–10)
7 (6–8)
8 (5–8)
–
8–0
10 (9–10)
Z1
9 (8–10)
9–11
11 (10–12)
9 (8–10)
10 (8–10)
–
8–10
10 (9–11)
Z4
74 (68–78)
69–77
73 (70–76)
73 (69–78)
76 (73–80)
72 (67–76)
76–80
71 (69–73)
Z5
113 (105–120)
100–126
109 (105–112)
110 (106–115)
113 (108–114)
108 (102–116)
110–118
110 (104–120)
st1‐st1
62 (58–65)
–
63 (55–68)
–
61 (58–65)
61 (61–62)
–
–
st2‐st2
73 (70–75)
–
77 (71–87)
70 (69–70)
71 (63–78)
‐
–
76 (75–76)
st3‐st3
85 (81–90)
–
87 (79–91)
–
85 (82–90)
81 (78–83)
–
–
st1‐st3
63 (61–66)
–
–
62
64 (63–65)
64 (61–66)
–
67 (67–68)
st4‐st4
94 (83–165)
–
91 (82–101)
–
86 (80–92)
–
–
–
gensl
129 (120–170)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5‐st5
74 (70–78)
–
76 (70–81)
73 (67–78)
68 (60–73)
70 (64–76)
–
79 (75–81)
gensw post. corn.
84 (80–88)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
23 (20–28)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisw
4 (4–5)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisl
13 (12–15)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisw
2 (2–3)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
125 (118–135)
130
132 (126–135)
115 (110–120)
131 (125–140)
117 (106–129)
123–134
130 (127–135)
vsw ant. corn.
84 (80–88)
85–90
83 (71–89)
79 (72–86)
87 (85–90)
83 (78–85)
89–92
87 (85–90)
vsw anus
82 (78–88)
–
86
79 (78–80)
84 (83–85)
–
–
87 (85–90)
gv3–gv3
23 (21–26)
–
–
–
–
–
–
26 (24–28)
JV5
70 (63–75)
62–77
72 (65–72)
–
67 (63–70)
–
–
66 (64–70)
scl
10 (8–13)
–
11
10
10
–
–
9 (8–10)
scw
14 (12–20)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Sge I
31 (27–35)
26–31
29 (27–30)
24
25
33 (29–36)
–
–
Sge II
33 (30–38)
31–39
33 (32–35)
28 (27–29)
33 (30–38)
32 (26–37)
–
31 (30–32)
Sge III
36 (30–40)
31–39
36 (35–37)
32
37 (33–48)
37 (36–39)
–
34 (32–35)
Sti III
26 (23–28)
26–28
27 (26–28)
22 (21–24)
26 (25–28)
–
–
25 (23–27)
StIII
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
25 (23–26)
Sge IV
63 (60–68)
57–69
63 (60–65)
61 (56‐66)
64 (60–67)
64 (61‐66)
65
57 (53–62)
Sti IV
38 (33–53)
46–54
47 (44–50)
44 (40–51)
43 (40–45)
45 (42–47)
40–42
43 (40–46)
St IV
64 (60–73)
57–69
66 (60–68)
59 (53–64)
64 (63–65)
62 (53–68)
62–66
59 (51–64)
fdl, No teeth
31 (30–33), 8
–, 11
33 (32–34), 9–10
33 (33–35), 9‐10
33, 9
–
–, 11
31 (30–32), 9
mdl, No teeth
34 (33–34), 3
–, 3
33 (31–34), 3
28 (28–30), 3
33, 3
–
–, 3
31 (30–32), 3
Download as Sources of measurements – Egypt: Abo-Shnaf & Moraes (2014); Ghana: Zannou et al.(2007); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2016a); Israel: Athias-Henriot (1962); Türkiye: Döker et al. (2020); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Egypt (5)
Ghana (1)
La Réunion (5)
Israel (10)
Türkiye (2)
dsl
265
275 (254–292)
258
289 (280–300)
255–295
267 (266–268)
dsw s4
145
179 (145–203)
190
180 (167–187)
–
144 (143–144)
dsw R1
175
–
–
–
–
158
j1
15
22 (20–24)
25
24 (23–25)
21–26
24 (23–24)
j3
38
44 (41–47)
43
44 (41–47)
44–49
42 (41–43)
j4
10
8 (7–11)
7
8 (8–10)
5–8
7
j5
8
8 (7–8)
7
8
5–8
7 (6–7)
j6
8
8 (7–9)
8
8
5–8
7
J2
8
8 (7–9)
7
8
5–8
8
J5
8
8 (7–8)
8
8
5–8
9
r3
18
21 (19–23)
20
21 (19–23)
21–23
21 (19–22)
R1
13
14 (13–14)
14
13 (13–15)
16–18
13 (12–13)
s4
55
61 (57–64)
59
63 (60–65)
57–65
65 (64–66)
S2
14
15 (13–18)
14
15 (13–18)
13–18
13 (12–13)
S4
8
9 (7–13)
9
14 (13–18)
9–13
11 (10–11)
S5
8
9 (8–10)
9
10 (8–11)
9–13
10
z2
13
14 (12–16)
13
15 (14–15)
12–16
17 (16–17)
z4
13
13 (10–15)
13
15 (14–15)
13–18
16 (15–16)
z5
8
7 (7–8)
6
8
5–8
7
Z1
8
11 (10–13)
8
8
10–16
8 (7–8)
Z4
50
52 (49–53)
52
58 (55–60)
49–62
56 (55–57)
Z5
68
74 (70–78)
80
79 (78–80)
73–81
80 (79–80)
st1-st1
50
55 (52–60)
–
52 (50–53)
–
–
st2-st2
32
59 (56–63)
–
60
–
–
st3-st3
63
61 (56–66)
–
60 (57–63)
–
–
st4-st4
50
47 (43–51)
–
49 (48–50)
–
–
st5‐st5
41
39 (35–43)
–
39 (35–40)
–
–
st1-st5
113
–
–
112* (110–113)
–
–
vsl
123
121 (109–128)
113
110 (108–110)
112–125
119 (118–120)
vsw ant. corn.
158
151 (123–164)
145
158 (150–160)
–
166 (165–167)
vsw anus
80
–
–
79 (75–80)
–
–
gv3–gv3
?
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
30
36 (33–39)
–
29 (28–31)
31–41
34
Sge I
18
24 (21–25)
–
20
–
–
Sge II
25
26 (23–28)
25
29 (28‐30)
–
29 (28–29)
Sge III
25
26 (23–28)
24
30
–
26 (25–26)
Sti III
20
21 (18–23)
20
28
–
23
StIII
–
–
–
–
–
22 (21–22)
Sge IV
40
45 (40–47)
39
47 (45–48)
39–52
42 (41–43)
Sti IV
28
36 (32–38)
35
38 (35–40)
31–44
37 (36–37)
St IV
42
54 (48–58)
50
54 (50–55)
49–62
51 (50–52)
fdl, No teeth
22, 6
26 (25–27), 6
–
31 (27–33), 6
–, 6
–, 7
mdl, No teeth
22, 1
25 (23–27), 1
–
29 (25–30), 1
–, 1
–, 1
shaft
18
20 (19–21)
19
21 (19–23)
–
19 (18–20)
branch
8
–
–
–
–
–
Amblyseius tamatavensis Blommers 1974: 144; Moraes et al. 1986: 31; Denmark & Muma 1989: 13; Chant & McMurtry 2004: 203; Ehara & Amano 2004: 17; Moraes et al. 2004b: 52; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 81; Döker et al. 2018: 101.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) tamatavensis, Ehara 2002: 33; Ehara & Amano 2002: 322.
Amblyseius aegyptiacus Denmark & Matthysse in Matthysse & Denmark 1981: 343 (synonymy according to Denmark & Muma 1989)
Amblyseius maai Tseng 1976: 123 (synonymy according to Denmark & Muma 1989).
Amblyseius tamatavensis, like the previous species, belongs to the obtusus species group, characterized by the presence of setae J2 and Z1, setae z4 are minute, and a female ventrianal shield that is neither vase-shaped nor divided. It is further classified in the aerialis species subgroup (46 species) due to the tubular calyx of the spermatheca (Chant and McMurtry 2004a).
It seems to fit the type III-b feeding habit (generalist predators living on glabrous leaves) as defined by McMurtry et al. (2013). Cavalcante et al. (2017) reported this species as a promising natural enemy of B. tabaci. Experimental releases on caged plants in a screen house have demonstrated its efficacy, reducing B. tabaci densities of on pepper plants by 60-80% (Massaro and Moraes 2019). Additionally, it can be easily mass-produced in large numbers using astigmatine mites as a food source, making it suitable for augmentative biological control programs (Massaro et al. 2021). This species has been reported in tropical areas from over 20 countries around the world including Africa, Asia, Americas, and Oceania. Measurements of specimens collected during this study are provided in table 7. This is the first record of this species from Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 4 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Australia (New South Wales, Queensland), Benin, Brazil (Alagoas, Amazonas, Bahia, Ceará, Esperíto Santo, Goiás, Minas Gerais, Pará, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Norte, Rio Grande do Sul, Roraima, Sergipe, São Paulo, Tocantins), Burundi, Cameroon, Cook Islands, Cuba, Dominican Republic, DR Congo, Easter Island/Isla de Pascua (Chile), Fiji, Ghana, Guadeloupe Island (France), Indonesia, Japan, Kenya, Madagascar Island, Malawi, Malaysia, Marie-Galante Island (France), Martinique (France), Mauritius Island, Mayotte Island (France), Mozambique, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Réunion Island (France), Rodrigues Island (Mauritius), Rwanda, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Uganda, USA (Florida), Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Western Samoa.
Remarks — The measurement values (Tables 7 and 8) are very close to that reported in the literature, especially for specimens from Africa. However, the current specimens exhibit r3, z2, Z5 and SgeIV being shorter compared to those of previous reports.
Download as Sources of measurements – Madagascar Holotype: Blommers (1974a); Other African Countries (Benin 2 ♀♀, Burundi 1♀, Cameroon 2♀♀, DR Congo 1♀, Ghana 2♀♀, Rwanda 1♀, Uganda 1♀): Zannou et al.(2007); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Thailand: Oliveira et al.(2012); Brazil (Bahia): Souza et al.(2015); Dominican Republic: Abo-Shnaf et al.(2016); USA (Florida): Döker et al. (2018); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (4) (this study)
Madagascar Holotype (1)
Other African Countries (10)
La Réunion (11)
Thailand (9)
Brazil (7)
Dominican Republic (5)
USA (4)
dsl
367 (348–388)
340
354 (328–390)
320 (295–338)
337 (310–360)
352 (323–379)
337 (320–350)
295 (292–298)
dsw s4
217 (195–232)
250
237 (218–256)
240 (223–288)
213 (190–230)
216 (182–238)
216 (200–228)
183 (180–184)
dsw R1
229 (205–248)
–
–
–
–
–
–
209 (208–210)
j1
32 (30–33)
32
31 (26–40)
30 (25–35)
32 (28–37)
33 (31–36)
28 (25–30)
32 (30–34)
j3
48 (44–52)
54
50 (38–59)
52 (48–55)
52 (49–55)
53 (50–57)
48 (43–50)
53 (52–54)
j4
4 (3–5)
4
5 (5–8)
4 (3–5)
5 (4–5)
5 (4–5)
4 (2–6)
5 (4–6)
j5
4 (3–5)
3
4 (3–5)
3 (3–5)
4 (3–4)
4 (3–4)
3 (2–4)
5 (4–6)
j6
5 (5–6)
3
6 (5––8)
3 (3–5)
5 (4–6)
5 (5–6)
3 (3–4)
5 (4–6)
J2
6 (5–6)
5
7 (5–8)
4 (3–5)
5 (5–7)
6 (5–6)
4 (4–5)
5 (4–6)
J5
7 (7–8)
6
8 (5––10)
6 (4–8)
6 (4–7)
7 (6–7)
5 (4–6)
7 (6–8)
r3
8 (7–9)
15
15 (14–18)
13 (10–15)
14 (9–17)
14 (13–16)
12 (11–13)
14 (12–16)
R1
6 (6–7)
5
8 (6–10)
5 (5–7)
7 (6–8)
8 (7–8)
7 (6–8)
5 (4–6)
s4
85 (83–88)
88
87 (77–96)
85 (80–90)
86 (80–92)
91 (90–92)
83 (76–88)
87 (86–88)
S2
8 (6–9)
5
8 (6–10)
5 (4–8)
7 (6–9)
7 (6–7)
7 (5–8)
5 (4–6)
S4
7 (6–8)
6
8 (6–10)
5 (4–6)
6 (5–9)
6 (6–7)
7 (5–8)
5 (4–6)
S5
5 (5–6)
6
8 (6–10)
5 (5–6)
6 (5–9)
6 (5–6)
5 (4–7)
5 (4–6)
z2
5
6
9 (8–11)
5 (5–6)
7 (6–9)
7 (6–8)
7 (5–10)
5 (4–6)
z4
7 (6–8)
6
8 (6–10)
6 (5–8)
6 (5–9)
8 (7–8)
7 (5–8)
5 (4–6)
z5
4 (3–5)
3
5 (3–6)
4 (3–4)
4 (3–5)
4 (3–4)
5 (4–7)
5 (4–6)
Z1
7 (5–8)
5
7 (5–8)
5 (4–6)
6 (5–7)
6 (6–7)
7 (5–8)
5 (4–6)
Z4
108 (106–110)
115
108 (94–125)
106 (100–113)
107 (86–116)
108 (100–115)
108 (105–113)
117 (114–120)
Z5
228 (215–235)
250
250 (221–272)
221 (203–233)
231 (212–240)
235 (227–246)
233 (225–238)
237 (232–242)
st1-st1
58 (55–60)
–
–
60 (55–63)
–
–
–
–
st2-st2
65 (64–68)
–
72 (67–77)
68 (65–70)
70 (67–75)
69 (67–72)
71 (70–73)
67 (66–68)
st3-st3
74 (70–76)
–
–
76 (70–80)
–
–
–
–
st1-st3
59 (58–60)
–
63 (59–66)
60 (58–63)
60 (58–65)
60 (58–63)
60 (58–63)
63 (60–64)
st4-st4
79 (78–80)
–
–
77 (68–88)
–
–
–
–
gensl
109 (105–115)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
72 (70–75)
–
73 (69–77)
73 (70–78)
74 (69–80)
73 (70–77)
71 (75–78)
68 (66–72)
gensw post. corn.
74 (72–75)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
20
–
–
19 (18–20)
–
–
–
–
lisw
5 (5–6)
–
–
7 (5–8)
–
–
–
–
sisl
12 (12–13)
–
–
10
–
–
–
–
sisw
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
121 (105–138)
120
122 (110–136)
111 (100–115)
117** **(110–125)
113 (108–118)
110 (100–118)
105 (104–108)
vsw ZV2
90 (88–92)
100
90 (75–101)
92 (85–100)
89 (79–100)
95 (89–99)
94 (90–100)
–
vsw anus
83 (80–85)
–
84 (69–102)
82 (75–88)
–
85 (80–87)
87 (83–90)
91 (88–94)
JV5
77 (75–80)
84
–
83 (70–93)
–
–
–
79 (78–80)
gv3–gv3
23 (21–25)
–
–
–
–
–
–
19 (18–20)
scl
42 (38–48)
–
23 (18–32)
17 (13–23)
12 (9–15)
17 (16–18)
14 (12–15)
–
scw
3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
SgeI
38 (36–39)
41
39 (39–40)
41 (39–43)
39 (37–44)
40 (37–42)
38 (35–40)
41 (40–42)
SgeII
35 (35–37)
39
38 (35–42)
39 (38–40)
36 (34–38)
39 (35–41)
37 (35–38)
40 (38–42)
SgeIII
52 (50–55)
61
58 (48–70)
55 (53–58)
55 (50–60)
57 (55–61)
54 (53–58)
53 (52–54)
StiIII
40 (38–42)
41
46 (34–53)
45 (43–48)
46 (42–48)
47 (46–47)
44 (43–45)
43 (42–44)
SgeIV
95 (88–98)
120
106 (85–126)
102 (100–103)
106 (100–120)
103 (100–105)
103 (97–115)
103 (102–104)
StiIV
69 (68–73)
–
69 (54–86)
73 (69–78)
72 (65–77)
77 (68–80)
69 (63–73)
73 (72–74)
StIV
63 (60–68)
–
71 (58–86)
69 (68–70)
66 (62–70)
71 (70–72)
58 (63–75)
71 (70–72)
fdl, No teeth
34 (33–35), 13
–
34 (34–35), 13
34 (30–38), 11
31 (29–35)
30 (27–32)
–
32 (30–33), 11
mdl, No teeth
36 (33–37), 3
–
39 (39–40), 3
37 (28–38), 3
38 (35 – 41)
37 (36–38)
–
32 (31–33), 4
Download as Sources of measurements – Brazil (Bahia): Souza et al.(2015); Ghana: Zannou et al.(2007); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Thailand: Oliveira et al.(2012); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Ghana (1)
La Réunion (5)
Thailand (1)
Brazil (2)
dsl
243
273
248 (245–250)
254
259–292
dsw s4
163
187
169 (150–195)
170
177–179
dsw R1
170
–
–
–
–
j1
25
25
24 (21–25)
25
27–29
j3
40
42
42 (40–45)
40
43–45
j4
4
5
4 (4–5)
5
4–5
j5
4
5
3 (3–4)
3
3–4
j6
5
5
3 (3–4)
4
5
J2
5
5
4 (4–5)
5
5
J5
5
5
5 (4–8)
6
7
r3
10
11
12 (10–13)
11
11–12
R1
8
–
5 (5–6)
6
7
s4
63
62
68 (58–90)
65
67–69
S2
5
6
5 (5–6)
6
6–7
S4
5
6
4
5
5–6
S5
5
6
4
5
5
z2
5
6
5 (5–6)
6
6
z4
6
5
6 (5–6)
6
7
z5
3
5
5
3
3–4
Z1
5
6
5
5
5–6
Z4
78
86
80 (75–83)
78
82–90
Z5
155
164
151 (143–158)
158
172
st1-st1
48
–
51 (50–53)
–
–
st2-st2
55
–
57 (55–58)
–
–
st3-st3
53
–
55 (53–58)
–
–
st4-st4
45
–
46 (43–110)
–
–
st5-st5
38
–
38 (38–48)
–
–
st1-st5
100
–
106 (100-112)
–
–
vsl
103
109
107 (100–113)
112
108–118
vsw ant. corn.
173
145
140 (130–150)
135
137–150
vsw anus
75
–
75 (63–90)
–
–
gv3–gv3
14
–
–
–
–
JV5
40
–
41 (38–43)
–
–
SgeI
30
30
31 (30–33)
30
31–32
SgeII
28
28
26 (20–28)
30
30–31
SgeIII
38
41
37 (35–40)
37
38
StiIII
30
31
30 (28–35)
34
33–34
SgeIV
63
62
63 (60–65)
68
67
StiIV
45
39
44 (40–48)
50
47–50
StIV
50
51
55 (53–60)
55
55–56
fdl, No teeth
24, 6
–
24 (23–25), 6
20
–
mdl, No teeth
24, ?
–
22 (20–25), 1
23
–
shaft
15
17
28 (25–30)
16
17
branch
5
–
–
–
–
Proprioseiopsina Chant & McMurtry 2004: 219.
Proprioseiopsis Muma 1961: 277.
Amblyseiopsis mexicanus Garman 1958: 75.
Amblyseius mexicanus, Moraes & McMurtry 1983: 134.
Proprioseiopsis mexicanus, Muma & Denmark 1970: 48; Denmark & Muma 1973: 237; Moraes et al. 1986: 118; Kreiter & Moraes 1997: 379; Moraes et al. 2004b: 181; Chant & McMurtry 2005a: 13, 2007: 89.
Amblyseiulus amotus Zack 1969: 72 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) asetus Chant, 1959: 80 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseiulus clausae Muma 1962: 1 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseius kogi Chant & Hansell 1971: 713 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) putmani Chant 1959: 91 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseeiulus temperellus Denmark & Muma1967: 171 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseiopsis tropicanus Garman 1958: 77 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseius (Proprioseiopsis) tulearensis Blommers 1976: 100 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseiulus versutus Zack 1969: 74 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Proprioseiopsis mexicanus belongs to the belizensis species group as genu I lacks macrosetae. It is classified within the asetus species subgroup due to its spermatheca having a short, cup-shaped calyx (Chant and McMurtry 2005a). This species is known from all islands of French West Indies (Kreiter and Moraes 1997; Moraes et al. 2000, Kreiter et al. 2006; Mailloux et al. 2010; Kreiter et al. 2018c) but was found in large number only during a previous study on companion plant in Guadeloupe (Mailloux et al. 2010) and on La Réunion (Le Bellec, unpub. data). This species seems to be very abundant on weeds in the lower vegetation. Phytoseiid mites of the genus Proprioseiopsis are mainly found in ground surfaces, humus, litter, soil, moss or on grass (Muma and Denmark 1970; McMurtry et al. 2015). Populations of P. mexicanus increase when fed T. urticae eggs (Megevand et al. 1993), and this species has shown potential as a predator of thrips (Kreiter, unpub. data). It is one of the prevailing phytoseiid species in citrus orchards in Alabama (Fadamiro et al. 2009). Denmark and Evans (2011) mentioned that the species can be reared on T. urticae and Oligonychus pratensis (Banks) and is associated with Bryobia praetiosa Koch, Bryobia sp. and P. ulmi. It was also found in association with Tetranychus evansi Baker and Pritchard (Furtado et al. 2014), although it is mentioned as a poor predator of this species. The biology of this species remains, however, almost unknown. This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single female (1 ♀) collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Australia, Benin, Brazil (Alagoas, Bahia, Distrito Federal Maranhão, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rondonia, São Paulo, Tocantins), Colombia, Cuba, Ghana, Guadeloupe Island (France), Hawaii, Kenya, Martinique Island, Mexico, New Zealand, Panama, Peru, Réunion Island (France), Rodrigues Island (Mauritius), USA (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia).
Remarks — The measurements of the single female specimen of the Ivory Coast (Table 9) fit well those obtained for populations of various countries. The number of setae on genu II of our single specimen is the same than the number given by Moraes et al. (2007) with the same formula: 2-2/0,2/0-1. This character may be of interest with some molecular taxonomy in the future, in the framework of an integrative taxonomy, in order to distinguish if we have one species or a species complex.
Download as Sources of measurements – Other African Countries: Moraes et al.(2007); Madagascar (identified as Amblyseius tulearensis, synonymized by Denmark & Evans 2011): Blommers (1976); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Brazil: Lofego et al.(2009); Guadeloupe: Kreiter & Moraes (1997); Martinique: Kreiter et al. (2018c); Holotype Mexico: Moraes et al.(2007); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Other African Countries (3)
Madagascar (?)
La Réunion (15)
Brazil (2)
Guadeloupe (5)
Martinique (12)
Mexico Holotype (1)
dsl
358
340 (336–344)
340
357 (325–368)
325–350
335 (331––339)
337 (312–369)
355
dsw s4
180
223 (214–230)
230
232 (213–240)
195–215
224 (212–241)
205 (186–257)
216
dsw R1
238
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
18
17 (16–18)
20
24 (23–28)
21–22
19 (15–22)
22 (19–24)
22
j3
33
28 (26–29)
27
31 (28–33)
30–31
30 (24–34)
30 (28–31)
28
j4
5
5 (5–6)
3
5 (5–8)
5
5 (4–7)
5 (3–6)
6
j5
5
4 (3–5)
4
4 (3–5)
5
5 (4–7)
5 (4–6)
5
j6
8
6 (5–6)
4
5 (3–8)
6
5 (5–6)
6 (5–7)
7
J5
9
9 (8–10)
7
9 (8–10)
9–10
9 (9–10)
10 (6–14)
7
r3
15
15 (14–16)
12
14 (13–15)
14–16
11 (9–14)
13 (13–16)
13
R1
?
8 (6–10)
12
10 (8–13)
10–11
9 (8–10)
9 (7–10)
7
s4
58
54 (53–56)
54
63 (58–68)
49–52
59 (56–65)
63 (53–68)
56
S2
10
9 (8–10)
9
9 (8–10)
8–9
9 (8–10)
9 (8––10)
8
S4
11
9 (8–10)
9
9 (8–10)
10
9 (8–10)
9 (8–10)
8
S5
10
10 (10–11)
9
10 (8–10)
10
9 (9–12)
10 (8–11)
8
z2
15
12 (8–16)
13
16 (13–18)
12
12 (11–14)
14 (13–15)
14
z4
10
9 (8–11)
9
11 (8–13)
11–12
10
10 (8–11)
10
z5
5
4 (3–5)
4
4 (3–5)
4
4 (4–5)
5 (4–5)
5
Z1
9
8
9
8 (8–10)
9
6 (5–7)
7 (6–8)
6
Z4
75
69 (62–74)
60
79 (75–83)
64–70
74 (72–76)
78 (66–83)
73
Z5
105
102 (94–112)
104
110 (103–120)
85–93
103 (97–110)
108 (95–131)
98
st1-st1
50
–
–
54 (53–58)
–
–
49 (45–52)
–
st2-st2
65
64
–
65 (63–68)
64–65
68 (65–74)
61 (57–64)
–
st3-st3
46
–
–
74 (73–80)
–
–
69 (62–71)
–
st1-st3
58
60 (59–61)
–
64 (63–75)
57–60
60 (58–62)
58 (55–62)
–
st4-st4
65
–
–
72 (68–75)
–
–
70 (64–74)
–
gensl
130
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
65
65 (61–69)
–
69 (63–73)
65–70
66 (64–72)
62 (58–69)
–
gensw post. corn.
83
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
24
–
–
27 (23–30)
–
–
23 (21–26)
–
lisw
3
–
–
5 (5–5)
–
–
6 (5–7)
–
sisl
8
–
–
11 (8–15)
–
–
12 (10–16)
–
sisw
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
108
113 (109–115)
115
116 (100–125)
102–108
108 (103–114)
102 (95–120)
112
vsw ant. corn.
98
97 (81–101)
90
86 (78–90)
92–95
92 (86–97)
91 (83–100)
96
vsw anus
80
77 (72–80)
–
66 (60–73)
80
85 (80–89)
75 (68–81)
–
gv3–gv3
15
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
63
–
62
71 (60–78)
60–65
–
68 (62–76)
–
scl
15
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
scw
10
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
SgeII
24
23 (22–24)
20
24 (23–28)
21–22
23 (20–24)
23 (21–24)
25
SgeIII
23
23 (22–24)
20
24 (23–25)
23
24 (23–25)
26 (21–28)
25
SgeIV
50
49 (45–51)
48
50 (43–55)
45
49 (48–51)
52 (46–55)
54
StiIV
33
27
30
31 (23–35)
26
32 (27–36)
32 (25–35)
32
StIV
55
58
61
61 (55–63)
55
56 (51–60)
59 (53–67)
62
fdl, No teeth
35, 8
29 (28–29), 8
28, 8
31 (30–33), 8 + 2
29, 8
33 (29–38)
29 (27–32), 9
–
mdl, No teeth
32, 1
34 (33–34), 1
28, 1
31 (30–33), 1
31, 1
31 (29–32)
33 (31–34), 1
–
Amblyseiopsis ovatus Garman 1958: 78.
Amblyseiulus ovatus, Muma 1961: 278.
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) ovatus, Chant 1959: 90.
Typhlodromus ovatus, Hirschmann 1962: 19.
Proprioseiopsis (Proprioseiopsis) ovatus, Karg 1989: 208.
Proprioseiopsis ovatus, Moraes et al. 1986: 121; 2004b: 184; Chant & McMurtry 2005a: 15; 2007: 89.
Proprioseiopsis antonelli Congdon 2002: 15 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseiuluscannaensis Muma 1962: 4 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseius hundsonianus Chant & Hansell 1971: 723 (Synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseius parapeltatus Wu & Chou 1981: 274 (synonymy according to Tseng 1983).
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) peltatus van der Merwe 1968: 119 (synonymy according to Tseng 1983).
Like P. mexicanus, P. ovatus belongs to the belizensis species (see above). As the spermatheca of this species is saccular, it belongs to the belizensis species subgroup (Chant and McMurtry 2005a).
This species is known from Guadeloupe, Marie-Galante and Martinique (Kreiter and Moraes 1997; Moraes et al. 2000; Mailloux et al. 2010; Kreiter et al. 2018c). It was found in large number only during a previous study on companion plants in Guadeloupe (Mailloux et al. 2010) and a recent study on La Réunion (Le Bellec, unpub. data). In other habitats, this species seems to be rare. Similar to P. mexicanus, P. ovatus seem to abundant on weeds in the lower vegetation. Denmark and Evans (2011) indicated that this species is associated with O. pratensis and Brevipalpus sp. It was also found in association with T. evansi (Furtado et al. 2014) but is considered a poor predator of that species. Despite this findings, the biology of this species remains largely unknown. This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single female (1 ♀) collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Argentina, Brazil (Alagoas, Bahia, Distrito Federal, Goías, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Pará, Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo), Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, French Guiana (France), Ghana, Grande Comore Island (Comoros), Hawaii, Honduras, Japan, Malaysia, Martinique Island (France), Mayotte Island (France), Mozambique, Peru, Philippines, Puerto Rico, La Réunion Island (France), Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Türkiye, USA (Arizona, California, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexica, Texas, Utah, Washington), Venezuela.
Remarks– The measurements of the single female specimen from the Ivory Coast (Table 10) fit well those obtained for populations from various countries.
Download as Sources of measurements – South Africa (identified as Amblyseius peltatus, synonymized by Tseng 1983): van der Merwe (1968); Madagascar (identified as Amblyseius peltatus, synonymized by Tseng 1983): Blommers (1976); Other African Countries (Ghana 4♀♀, Kenya 2♀♀, Sierra-Leone 1♀, Zimbabwe 1♀, South Africa 2♀♀): Moraes et al.(2007a); La Réunion: Kreiter et al.(2020c); Sri Lanka: Moraes et al.(2004b); Thailand: Oliveira et al.(2012); USA Holotype: Moraes & McMurtry (1983); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
South Africa (3)
Madagascar (?)
Other African Countries (10)
La Réunion (12)
Sri Lanka (1)
Thailand (8)
USA Holotype (1)
dsl
388
358–362
320
348 (324–381)
361 (328–400)
357
329 (320–337)
372
dsw s4
288
294–313
230
270 (227–290)
290 (253–330)
292
268 (225–315)
252
dsw R1
338
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
?
28–30
32
29 (28–32)
31 (30–35)
27
26 (24–29)
28
j3
?
66
61
64 (57–69)
66 (57–75)
61
64 (60–68)
64
j4
5
6
–
6 (4–8)
5 (5–8)
5
6 (5–8)
8
j5
9
6
–
6 (5–8)
5 (4–8)
–
5 (5–6)
8
j6
8
9–13
–
9 (8–10)
10 (8–13)
8
11
12
J5
10
9–13
–
8 (6–10)
8 (8–10)
9
8 (6–9)
8
r3
20
20
–
19 (16–21)
20 (15–25)
20
21 (17–25)
22
R1
13
10
–
10 (9–11)
13 (10–15)
11
10 (10–11)
17
s4
105
105–110
100
99 (91–106)
103 (93–108)
96
100 (98–100)
88
S2
20
19–21
21
20 (14–26)
21 (18–25)
22
21 (14–25)
17
S4
15
9–13
–
14 (9–16)
13 (10–17)
13
16 (12–18)
16
S5
10
9–13
–
10 (9–11)
12 (10–15)
11
12 (10–15)
12
z2
40
43–45
30
39 (32–44)
42 (35–53)
45
34 (31–36)
42
z4
28
28–30
25
25 (19–34)
26 (18–36)
24
22 (20–27)
22
z5
5
6
–
6 (5–8)
5 (5–6)
5
5 (4–6)
8
Z1
13
19–21
–
21 (14–24)
24 (23–25)
20
21 (18–25)
17
Z4
?
122
100
108 (88–120)
107 (103–118)
107
109 (105–115)
101
Z5
100
105–110
110
88 (67–107)
95 (90–103)
96
92 (83–96)
90
st1-st1
53
–
–
–
54 (49–60)
–
–
–
st2-st2
75
–
–
70 (63–77)
76 (70–80)
70
73 (70–77)
–
st3-st3
88
82 (78–84)
–
–
93 (85–98)
–
–
–
st1-st3
55
48–52
–
53 (50–56)
60 (55–63)
47
54 (52–55)
–
st4-st4
91
–
–
–
91 (83–98)
–
–
–
gensl
128
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
92
111–115
102
89 (82–96)
95 (88–103)
93
92 (90–97)
–
gensw ant. corn.
110
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
25
–
–
–
30 (25–33)
–
–
–
Lisw
6
–
–
–
5 (4–5)
–
–
–
sisl
13
–
–
–
10
–
–
–
sisw
3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
115
110–115
93
109 (98–122)
114 (103–133)
115
106 (100–115)
–
vsw ant. corn.
113
110–115
102
108 (104–115)
97 (75–115)
113
112 (109–115)
–
vsw anus
75
–
–
90 (84–104)
87 (75–95)
90
–
–
**gv3*–gv3**
23
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
73
89–93
77
–
85 (75–95)
–
78
-
scl
14
24
–
16 (13–19)
22 (18–23)
18
14 (12–17)
22
scw
8
10
–
–
9 (8–10)
–
–
–
SgeIII
26
33
32
28 (25–32)
27 (22–31)
25
27 (24–29)
–
StiIII
23
–
–
–
22 (20–25)
–
24 (22–26)
–
SgeIV
65
66
50
58 (46–66)
61 (55–65)
50
55 (45–61)
55
StiIV
43
45
36
41 (34–47)
40 (35–45)
37
37 (35–40)
43
StIV
93
90
86
84 (77–91)
87 (73–105)
79
88 (83–90)
96
fdl, No teeth
33, 6
33, 5
–
30 (28–32), 5
32 (25–35), 6–7
32, 6–7
30 (29–31)
–
mdl, No teeth
33, 1
35, 1
–
33 (32–34), 1
32 (30–35), 1
30, 1
31 (29–34)
–
Euseiini Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 191.
Iphiseius Berlese, 1916: 33, Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 217, 2007: 123.
Seius degenerans Berlese 1889: 9.
Amblyseius (Iphiseius) degenerans, Muma 1961: 288.
Typhlodromus degenerans, Hirschmann 1962: 2.
Iphiseius (Iphiseius) degenerans, Pritchard & Baker 1962: 299.
Amblyseius degenerans, Zaher 1986: 99, Northcraft 1987: 521, Papadoulis & Emmanouel 1991: 36.
Iphiseius degenerans, Berlese 1921: 95, Evans 1954: 518, Moraes et al. 1986: 61, 2004b: 92, Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 215, 2007: 125.
Iphiseius martigellus El-Badry 1968: 325 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry 2005b).
The biological characteristics of this Ethiopian species have been well documented because of its use in controlling thrips on various cultivated plants in greenhouses. Iphiseius degenerans is a commercially available biological control agent of thrips and spider mites in greenhouse crops. Although it can feed on a wide range of foods, thrips larvae and sweet pepper pollen are less favourable for immature development (Vanthornhout et al. 2004, 2005), potentially hindering the establishment of this predator in sweet pepper crops. According to McMurtry et al. (2013), I. degenerans is classified as a type-IV generalist predator, it is one of the most common native phytoseiid mite species on cassava in southern Africa (Zannou et al. 2005) and feeds on Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) (Nwilene and Nachman 1996), a widely distributed neotropical mite pest of cassava in Africa, as well as insect larvae and pollen of many plants (Vantornhout et al. 2005). Another study concluded that I. degenerans can be considered a suitable biological control candidate based on its preference with Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) in the Mediterranean region (Fantinou et al. 2012). Iphiseius degenerans preys on Oligonychus perseae Tuttle, Baker & Abbatiello outside the webbed nests. Although I. degenerans contributed towards the control of O. perseae, it is effectiveness is limited and needs further investigation, considering the inclusion of alternative food (e.g. Castor oil pollen) for predator population growth (Zappala et al. 2015). This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 34 ♀♀ and 21 ♂♂ collected between 05/IV/2017 and 17/IV/2018 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — numerous countries in Northern and Southern Africa (Demite et al. 2024), Mediterranean area (Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Portugal), Near East or Middle East (Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Türkiye, Yemen), in Europe (Georgia), South America (Brazil) and in North America (USA in California, Florida, Georgia, New Hampshire), Indian Ocean (Grande Comore Island, Comoros).
Remarks — The measurements of the 10 ♀♀ + 1 ♂ (Tables 11 & 12) fit well with measurements of specimens reported in the literature.
Download as Sources of measurements – Algeria: Athias-Henriot (1957); Kenya: El-Banhawy & Knapp (2011); Other African Countries (Burundi 1♀, Cameroon 1♀, Ghana 1♀, Kenya 2♀♀, Malawi 2♀♀, Rwanda 1♀, Sierra Leone 2♀♀, Uganda 1♀, Zambia 1♀): Moraes et al.(2007); Grande Comore: Kreiter et al.2018b; Spain: Ferragut et al. (2010); Syria: Barbar (2013); Türkiye: Döker et al. (2018); –: not reported.
Characters
Ivory Coast (10) (this study)
Algeria (?)
Kenya (66)
Other African Countries (12)
Grande Comore (7)
Spain (?)
Syria (20)
Türkiye (10)
dsl
387 (360–450)
–
360
373 (363–387)
420 (370–462)
374–382
405 (395–420)
383 (378–388)
dsw s4
297 (258–400)
–
345
309 (290–317)
362 (350–375)
284–294
359 (355–360)
263 (260–265)
dsw R1
329 (286–390)
–
–
–
–
–
–
274 (270–278)
j1
25 (20–28)
27
23
24 (14–32)
24 (20–25)
24
27 (25–38)
24 (20–28)
j3
3
–
–
5 (4–8)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
j4
3
–
–
4 (3–6)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
j5
3
–
–
4 (3–5)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
j6
3
–
–
5 (4–6)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
J2
3 (3–5)
–
–
6 (4–7)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
J5
3
–
–
6 (5–7)
5
–
5
4 (3–5)
r3
6 (6–7)
–
–
12 (10-13)
14 (13–15)
–
5
4 (3–5)
R1
5
–
–
9 (7-10)
11 (9–13)
–
5
4 (3–5)
s4
8 (8–9)
–
–
9 (7–12)
8
7–8
5
4 (3–5)
S2
5
–
–
8 (6–9)
8
4–5
5
4 (3–5)
S4
5
–
–
9 (6–11)
9 (8–9)
4–7
5
4 (3–5)
S5
5
–
–
9 (7–11)
9 (8–9)
6–7
5
4 (3–5)
z2
3
–
–
5 (4–8)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
z4
3
–
–
5 (4–9)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
z5
3
–
–
4 (3–5)
5
4
5
4 (3–5)
Z1
3
–
–
6 (5–8)
5
4–5
5
4 (3–5)
Z4
6 (6–7)
–
–
7 (5–9)
8 (6–9)
4–6
5
4 (3–5)
Z5
13 (11–13)
14
12
14 (11–20)
14 (11–15)
10–12
16 (13–17)
11 (10–13)
st1-st1
55 (53–58)
–
–
–
57 (55–60)
–
60
–
st2-st2
68 (65–72)
–
46
49 (42–52)
54 (53–55)
–
75 (72–78)
69 (65–73)
st3-st3
84 (83–86)
–
64
71 (67–73)
71 (68–75)
–
92 (90–92)
–
st1-st3
52 (50–55)
–
–
–
86 (65–93)
–
60 (60–62)
54 (53–55)
st4-st4
90 (86–95)
–
–
–
96 (90–100)
–
105 (105–107)
–
gensl
149 (135–168)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
St5-St5
96 (92–100)
–
100
–
96 (90–103)
–
105 (100–110)
101 (98–105)
gensw post. corn.
101 (95–113)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
35 (33–38)
–
–
–
36 (30–38)
–
–
–
lisw
5 (5–6)
–
–
–
5 (4–8)
–
–
–
sisl
13 (10–15)
–
–
–
14 (13–18)
–
–
–
sisw
2
–
–
–
–
vsl
26 (23–33)
–
–
–
35 (33–38)
–
–
–
vsw ant. corn.
72 (68–87)
–
74
65 (58–73)
77 (70–83)
–
–
–
asl
61 (58–65)
–
–
–
72 (68–75)
–
–
–
asw anus
74 (72–76)
–
–
72 (68–77)
77 (70–83)
–
–
–
JV5
24 (22–25)
–
14
–
24 (20–25)
–
30 (28–30)
19 (18–20)
gv3–gv3
31 (30–31)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
scl
37 (35–40)
–
–
–
–
–
30
35 (33–38)
scw
< 1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
SgeII
20 (18–25)
22
23
–
24 (21–25)
–
–
–
SgeIII
26 (23–28)
33
35
–
30 (28–33)
–
–
–
StiIII
23 (21–25)
27
–
–
25 (25–26)
–
–
–
SgeIV
40 (38–45)
42
30
–
43 (40–50)
38–44
43(40–45)
38 (35–40)
StiIV
30 (28–33)
35
25
–
29 (25–33)
32–36
34 (30–35)
32 (30–33)
StIV
27 (23–30)
37
38
–
32 (30–33)
28–34
30
26 (25–28)
fdl, No teeth
26 (25–28), 8
–
–
26 (24–27), 6–8
27 (25–30), –
–
28, 5-6
27 (25–28), 6
mdl, No teeth
29 (23–30), 2
–
–
31 (27–35), 1–2
25 (23–27), –
–
25, 1
24 (23–25), 1
Download as Sources of measurements – Kenya: el-Banhawy & Knapp (2011); South Africa: van der Merwe (1968); Other African Countries (Ghana 1♀, Kenya 1♀, Rwanda 1♀, Sierra Leone 1♀, Uganda 1♀): Moraes et al.(2007); Grande Comore: Kreiter et al. (2021); Türkiye: Döker et al. (2018a); –: not reported.
Characters
Ivory Coast (5) (this study)
Kenya (?)
South Africa (?)
Other African Countries (5)
Grande Comore (4)
Türkiye (3)
dsl
344 (338–350)
–
353-376
318 (283–356)
306 (295-312)
353 (350–355)
dsw s4
260 (253–267)
–
282-294
255 (244–261)
232 (238-250)
233 (230–235)
dsw R1
278 (270–288)
–
–
–
–
234 (240–247)
j1
23 (22–24)
–
28-31
20 (11–25)
21 (18-23)
22 (20–24)
j3
3
–
–
5 (4–5)
5
4 (3–5)
j4
3
–
–
3 (3–5)
5
4 (3–5)
j5
3
–
–
3 (3–4)
5
4 (3–5)
j6
3
–
–
4 (4–5)
5
4 (3–5)
J2
3
–
–
4 (3–4)
5
4 (3–5)
J5
4
–
–
5 (4–6)
5
4 (3–5)
r3
6
–
–
11 (10–12)
12 (10-13)
4 (3–5)
R1
5
–
–
7 (6–9)
6 (5-9)
4 (3–5)
s4
3
–
–
7 (6–9)
5
4 (3–5)
S2
3
–
–
6 (5–7)
7
4 (3–5)
S4
3
–
–
6 (5–8)
7
4 (3–5)
S5
3
–
–
7 (5–10)
7
4 (3–5)
z2
3
–
–
4 (3–5)
5
4 (3–5)
z4
3
–
–
4 (3–5)
5
4 (3–5)
z5
3
–
–
3 (3–4)
5
4 (3–5)
Z1
3
–
–
5
5
4 (3–5)
Z4
3
–
–
5 (4–5)
8
4 (3–5)
Z5
15 (13–17)
–
15-19
13 (9–16)
14 (13-15)
10 (9–12)
st1–st1
49 (47–61)
–
–
–
49 (48-50)
–
st2–st2
62 (60–64)
–
–
–
62 (60-63)
–
st3–st3
65 (64–67)
–
–
–
64 (60-68)
–
st4–st4
57 (54–60)
–
–
–
60 (58-63)
–
st5–st5
113 (111–115)
–
–
–
52 (48-58)
–
st1–st5
51 (48–53)
–
–
–
114 (110-118)
–
vsl
72 (70–75)
86
68-73
72 (65–85)
71 (68-73)
–
vsw ant. corn.
169 (154–180)
210
188-195
176 (172–179)
171 (165-175)
–
asl
50 (46–53)
63
49-53
50 (48–53)
51 (48-55)
–
asw
60 (58–63)
75
65-69
66 (63–75)
64 (58-68)
–
JV5
17 (16–18)
–
21-24
–
22 (20-23)
–
gv3–gv3
25
–
–
–
–
–
SgeII
20
–
26-28
21 (18–24)
21 (18-25)
–
SgeIII
26 (25–26)
–
35-38
27 (21–32)
29 (28-30)
–
StiIII
23 (20–25)
–
26-28
21 (20–24)
24 (23-25)
–
SgeIV
35 (33–38)
–
44-48
36 (30–40)
42 (40-43)
36 (34–38)
StiIV
28 (27–29)
–
34-38
28 (27–30)
30 (28-30)
31 (30–33)
StIV
28 (27–29)
–
31-35
28 (26–32)
31 (30-33)
27 (25–28)
fdl, No teeth
23 (20–24), 5
–
24, 4
–
23 (20-25), 4
24 (23–25), 4
mdl, No teeth
21 (19–22), 1
–
24, 1
–
22 (20-23), 1
22 (20–23), 1
shaft
25
22
28
29 (22–45)
24 (23-25)
32 (28–35)
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) section Euseius, Wainstein, 1962: 15;
Euseius De Leon, 1967: 86.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) fustis Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 283; Ueckermann & Loots, 1988: 83.
Euseius fustis, Matthysse & Denmark, 1981: 348; Moraes et al. 1986: 45, 2004b: 69; Moraes & McMurtry, 1988: 15; Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 215, 2007: 121.
Bruce-Oliver et al. (1996) have tested various foods associated with cassava for their effect on the development, fecundity and longevity of Euseius fustis, the most common phytoseiid species found on cassava in Africa. Euseius fustis developed successfully to adulthood on the spider mite prey species Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) and Oligonychus gossypii (Zacher) and on pollen from maize, castor bean, and cassava. Euseius fustis also completed development on water-diluted phloem exudate from cassava, diluted honeydew from the cassava mealybug and on various pollen and prey combinations. When reared on Tetranychus urticae Koch prey or free water only, E. fustis did not develop after the deutonymphal stage. All larvae held on clean leaf discs on water-soaked cotton died without moulting. Diets of maize plus castor bean pollen and maize pollen plus M. tanajoa resulted in the highest rate of development, the highest fecundity and the greatest longevity. Castor bean pollen alone and maize pollen alone produced a higher fecundity and greater longevity than M. tanajoa tested alone. A colony of E. fustis reared continuously for seven generations on castor bean pollen produced nine times more adult females than a colony of E. fustis reared continuously on M. tanajoa. No negative effects on the development and fecundity of E. fustis were observed after seven generations were reared on pollen. On cassava, the leaf-dwelling Typhlodromalus manihoti and E. fustis occur on the middle leaves, whereas the apex-inhabiting T. aripo migrates from the apex to the top leaves only during the night (Magalhaes et al. 2002). We found that differential distributions of these predators allow prey to escape predation by vertical migration to other plant strata. We studied the role of odours in the underlying prey behaviour on predator-free plants placed downwind from plants with predators and prey or with prey only. Prey showed increased vertical migration in response to predator-related odours. Moreover, these responses were specific: when exposed to odours associated with T. manihoti, prey migrated upwards, irrespective of the plant stratum where they were placed. Odours associated with T. aripo triggered a flexible response: prey on the top leaves migrated downwards, whereas prey on the middle leaves migrated upwards. Odours associated with E. fustis, a low-risk predator, did not elicit vertical migration. Further experiments revealed that: (1) prey migrate up or down depending on the stratum where they are located, and (2) prey discrimination among predators is based upon the perception of predator species-specific body odours. Thus, at the scale of a single plant, odour-based enemy specification allows herbivorous mites to escape predation by vertical migration. This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single specimen (1 ♀) collected between 05/IV/2017 and 17/IV/2018 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) and 107 ♀♀ and 39 ♂♂ collected between 06/IV/2017 au 18/III/2018 in Yamoussoukro, Ngattakro (aasl 158 m, Lat 6°49′39.443″N; Long 5°17′21.635″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Benin, Burundi, Cape Verde, Congo, DR Congo, Ghana, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe.
Remarks — The measurements of specimens from the Ivory Coast (tables 13 and 14) are very close to those of specimens from other regions of Africa.
Download as Sources of measurements – Cape Verde: Ferragut & Baumann (2021); DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) Holotype: Pritchard & Baker (1962) in Moraes & McMurtry (1988); Kenya1: Moraes & McMurtry (1988); Kenya2: El-Banhawy & Knapp (2011); Tanzania: El-Banhawy & Abou-Awad (1990); Other African Countries (Uganda 1♀, RDC: 1♀): Moraes et al. (2001); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (10) (this study)
Cape Verde (5)
DRC (1) Holotype
Kenya1 (3)
Kenya2 (1?)
Tanzania (1)
Other African Countries (2)
dsl
345 (330–358)
341 (326–347)
365
347 (334–360)
310
–
344 (329–360)
dsw s4
221 (205–228)
204 (199–214)
233
222 (216–226)
200
–
221 (206–235)
dsw R1
216 (205–225)
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
28 (25–30)
27 (26–27)
28
22 (19–26)
23
29
24 (21–27)
j3
15 (13–17)
19 (18–20)
18
18 (17–19)
17
29
15 (14–16)
j4
8 (6–8)
10 (8–11)
13
11 (10–12)
9
15
10
j5
7 (6–8)
11
12
11 (10–12)
9
15
9 (8–10)
j6
8 (8–9)
13 (12–13)
13
14 (12–14)
12
22
11
J2
10 (9–11)
14 (13–15)
14
16 (14–17)
14
22
14 (13–14)
J5
7 (6–8)
8 (7–8)
6
7
8
11
7 (6-8)
r3
13 (11–16)
16 (15–16)
14
15 (12–17)
5
14
14
R1
7 (6–9)
13
12
13 (12–14)
12
15
11
s4
16 (15–17)
23 (22–24)
18
21 (17–24)
19
31
18 (16–21)
S2
12 (10–13)
16 (13–17)
12
14 (12–17)
15
25
12 (11–13)
S4
13 (11–15)
12 (11–13)
12
13 (10–14)
13
24
11
S5
11 (9–13)
14 (13–17)
12
12 (10–14)
13
26
11
z2
8 (8–9)
15 (14–16)
14
14 (12–17)
14
22
11 (10–13)
z4
10 (9–11)
13 (12–13)
14
14 (12–17)
14
22
12 (11–13)
z5
8 (6–9)
12 (11–13)
13
11 (10–12)
12
18
10
Z1
8 (8–9)
13 (13–14)
14
11 (10–12)
14
22
10 (10–11)
Z4
11 (10–12)
14 (12–15)
13
14 (12–17)
14
26
12 (11–13)
Z5
44 (41–48)
46 (42–49)
47
45 (43–48)
42
48
41 (37–45)
st1-st1
57 (54–58)
–
–
–
–
–
–
st2-st2
65 (63–68)
–
72
70 (67–72)
65
–
68 (67–69)
st3-st3
77 (75–80)
–
–
–
–
–
st1-st3
58 (55–60)
–
64
62 (60–65)
62
–
62
st4-st4
92 (86–104)
–
–
–
–
–
–
gensl
121 (115–125)
–
–
–
–
–
–
st5-st5
75 (73–78)
–
86
80 (77–84)
82
–
76 (74–78)
gensw post. corn.
86 (84–88)
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
25 (23–26)
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisw
5
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisl
7 (6–8)
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisw
< 1
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
95 (93–98)
–
–
100 (98–101)
90
–
100 (96–104)
vsw ZV2
53 (50–55)
–
48
48 (46–50)
62
–
50
vsw anus
67 (64–68)
–
62
70 (67–72)
–
–
60 (58–62)
gv3 – gv3
32 (30–33)
–
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
32 (28–36)
–
–
–
28
–
–
SgeI
33 (31–34)
–
28
20 (19–22)
22
18 (18–19)
scl
6
–
–
56 (48–65)
40
–
30 (29–32)
scw
23 (21–25)
–
–
–
–
–
–
SgeII
22 (20–23)
–
24
–
22
20
21 (19–22)
SgeIII
29 (26–31)
–
28
29 (26–31)
25
20
27 (22–32)
StiIII
19 (18–20)
–
19
19
20
14
18 (18–19)
SgeIV
44 (41–47)
–
48
41 (38–43)
45
42
39 (34–45)
StiIV
30 (28–33)
–
28
24
18
23
24 (22–26)
StIV
41 (40–43)
–
42
43 (41–46)
48
28
41 (37–45)
fdl, No teeth
25 (24–25), 8
–
–
24, –
–, 3
–
–
mdl, No teeth
23 (22–24), 2
–
–
24, –
–, 2
–
–
Download as Sources of measurements – Cape Verde: Ferragut & Baumann (2021); –: not reported.
Characters
Ivory Coast (5) (this study)
Cape Verde (6)
dsl
252 (248–258)
250 (242–257)
dsw s4
173 (163–180)
175 (169–182)
dsw R1
173 (163–180)
–
j1
22 (20–25)
22 (20–25)
j3
14 (13–15)
17 (16–17)
j4
5 (5–6)
12 (11–13)
j5
5 (5–6)
11 (10–12)
j6
6 (6–7)
12 (11–13)
J2
8 (8–9)
12 (11–14)
J5
5 (5–6)
8 (7–8)
r3
11 (10–13)
16 (15–18)
R1
7 (6–8)
13 (11–16)
s4
14 (13–16)
23 (20–25)
S2
8
15 (13–17)
S4
8 (8–9)
13 (12–15)
S5
9 (8–10)
12 (11–13)
z2
7 (6–8)
14 (13–15)
z4
7
12 (11–14)
z5
6 (6–8)
10 (9–11)
Z1
6 (5–7)
10 (9–11)
Z4
8
13 (11–14)
Z5
37 (36–39)
39 (36–41)
st1–st1
48 (46–50)
–
st2–st2
54 (53–56)
74 (72–76)
st3–st3
59 (58–61)
–
st4–st4
46 (45–48)
–
st5–st5
38 (36–39)
–
st1–st5
96 (95–98)
111 (109–112)
vsl
103 (98–108)
49 (47–51)
vsw
136 (133–138)
137 (128–146)
vsw anus
54 (53–58)
–
gv3-gv3
22 (21–23)
22 (20–23)
JV5
24 (23–27)
26 (24–28)
SgeI
19 (18–21)
22 (21–23)
SgeII
20 (18–22)
20 (20–21)
SgeIII
26 (24–28)
26(25–28)
StiIII
18 (18–19)
17 (16–18)
SgeIV
38 (36–39)
34 (33–34)
StiIV
25 (24–27)
23 (22–23)
StIV
33 (31–35)
34 (33–35)
fdl, No teeth
20 (19–22), 6
22 (21–22), 4 or 5*
mdl, No teeth
19 (18–20), 1
21 (20–21), 1
shaft
20 (20–21)
–
Branch
6 (5–6)
–
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) lokele Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 271.
Euseius lokele, Moraes et al. 1986: 47, 1989a: 99, 1989b: 85, 2004b: 72; Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 215, 2007: 121.
Euseius lokele was found on Solanum aethiopicum in association with tetranychid and tarsonemid mites in southern Benin (Moraes et al. 2001). But, its biology is unknown. This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single specimen (1 ♀) collected between 05/IV/2017 and 17/IV/2018 in Toumodi, Yobouekro (aasl 184 m, Lat 6°31′19.196″N, Long 5°6′41.36″W) and 12 ♀♀ and 6 ♂♂ collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, DR Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Uganda.
Remarks — The measurements of specimens from the Ivory Coast (tables 15 and 16) are very close to those of specimens from other regions of Africa.
Download as Sources of measurements – DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) Holotype: Pritchard & Baker (1962) in Moraes et al. (1989); DRC Paratype: Pritchard & Baker (1962) in Swirski & Ragusa (1978); Kenya1: Moraes et al. (1989a); Kenya2: Swirski & Ragusa (1978); Kenya3: El-Banhawy & Knapp (2011); Other African Countries (Benin: 1♀, Burundi: 2♀♀, Cameroon: 1♀, Ghana: 2♀♀, Kenya:7♀♀, Sierra Leone: 2♀♀, Uganda: 3♀♀, Zaire: 3♀♀): Moraes et al. (2001); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (13) (this study)
DRC (1) Holotype
DRC (1) Paratype
Kenya1 (5)
Kenya2 (1)
Kenya3 (1?)
Other African Countries (21)
dsl
366 (325–400)
320
–
346 (334– **355)
–
310
323 (291– **408)
dsw s4
237 (215– 260)
220
–
233 (218– **240)
–
210
219 (200– **274)
dsw R1
234 (212– 250)
–
–
–
–
–
–
j1
30 (24– 35)
33
30
29 (26– **31)
23
27
27 (26– **35)
j3
13 (10– 16)
8
22
17 (10– **22)
17
16
11 (10– **24)
j4
8 (6– 10)
8
9
9 (7– **12)
9
10
6 (6– **11)
j5
9 (7– 10)
8
–
10 (7– **12)
–
10
6 (6– **11)
j6
12 (9– 14)
8
–
11 (10– **12)
–
10
8 (6– **14)
J2
13 (11– 15)
9
12
12 (10– **12)
13
12
10 (8– **16)
J5
7 (6– 8)
6
–
7 (5– **10)
–
7
6 (5– **8)
r3
14 (11–20)
16
–
15* *(12– **17)
–
17
14 (11– **22)
R1
12 (10–13)
–
–
12
–
10
10 (8– **13)
s4
17 (13–24)
13
20
21 (14– **26)
28
25
14 (11– **29)
S2
13 (12–15)
11
–
13 (12– **14)
–
14
12 (10– **16)
S4
13 (11–15)
11
12
12 (10– **14)
13
12
10 (8– **18)
S5
12 (11–14)
11
–
12 (10– **14)
–
12
10 (7– **16)
z2
11 (8–14)
9
13
12 (10– **14)
12
12
10 (6– **16)
z4
12 (9–15)
8
–
13 (10– **17)
–
14
10 (8– **16)
z5
10 (8–14)
8
–
10 (7– **12)
–
10
8 (6– **11)
Z1
11 (9–14)
10
–
11 (10– **12)
–
12
11 (8– **14)
Z4
12 (10–16)
8
–
12 (10– **14)
–
13
11 (8– **16)
Z5
61 (55–65)
47
61
57 (53– **58)
60
55
51 (48– **70)
st1-st1
63 (60–65)
–
–
–
–
–
–
st2-st2
73 (69–75)
66
–
72 (65– **77)
–
70
68 (64– **80)
st3-st3
80 (76–82)
–
–
–
–
–
–
st1-st3
60 (55–63)
53
–
61 (55– **62)
–
60
57 (40– **67)
st4-st4
114 (110–118)
–
–
– **
–
–
– **
gensl
124 (113–133)
–
–
– **
–
–
– **
st5-st5
75 (73–78)
65
–
78 (77– **79)
–
80
71 (67– **86)
gensw post. corn.
86 (85–88)
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisl
25 (23–28)
–
–
–
–
–
–
lisw
4 (3–4)
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisl
12 (10–14)
–
–
–
–
–
–
sisw
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
99 (95–105)
88
–
91 (86– **96)
–
92
91 (88– **120)
vsw ant. corn.
53 (50–56)
44
–
48 (48– **50)
–
– **
50 (40– **58)
vsw anus
72 (68–76)
65
–
70 (65– **72)
–
60
72 (62– **82)
gv3 – gv3
28 (26–30)
–
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
45 (43–57)
–
42
–
43
–
–
Scl
18 (16–20)
16
–
18 (17– **22)
–
18
14 (11– **19)
Scw
8 (7–8)
–
–
– **
–
7
–
SgeI
–
19
–
25 (22– **29)
–
–
–
SgeII
30 (26–33)
28
–
32 (29– **36)
–
32
28 (24– **34)
SgeIII
42 (40–45)
33
–
37 (36– **41)
–
37
35 (32– **42)
StiIII
29 (26–32)
24
–
32 (31– **34)
–
–
26 (22– **34)
SgeIV
62 (58–68)
58
–
66 (60– **74)
–
60
54 (50– **70)
StiIV
41 (36–45)
39
–
42 (41– **43)
–
38
34 (30– **53)
StIV
73 (69–77)
66
–
76 (67– **82)
–
70
68 (62– **86)
fdl, No teeth
25 (24–29), 6
–
–
29
–
–, 4
–
mdl, No teeth
25 (23–26), 2
–
–
26
–
–, 2
–
Download as
Characters
Ivory Coast (5) (this study)
dsl
281 (275–288)
dsw s4
209 (203–218)
dsw R1
208 (203–216)
j1
27 (25–28)
j3
12 (11–13)
j4
8 (8–9)
j5
8 (8–9)
j6
10 (8–11)
J2
13 (12–13)
J5
6 (5–6)
r3
17 (16–18)
R1
12 (10–13)
s4
22 (20–24)
S2
15 (14–16)
S4
13 (12–13)
S5
12 (11–13)
z2
12 (11–13)
z4
13 (12–13)
z5
10 (9–11)
Z1
12 (12–13)
Z4
13 (12–14)
Z5
52 (50–53)
st1–st1
54 (53–55)
st2–st2
63 (60–65)
st3–st3
60 (59–60)
st4–st4
48 (47–49)
st5–st5
38 (37–39)
st1–st5
108 (107–110)
vsl
110 (108–113)
vsw ant. corn.
157 (153–160)
Vsw anus
61 (55–65)
gv3-gv3
26 (25– 27**)
JV5
26 (25–28)
SgeII
24 (23–25)
SgeIII
29 (28–30)
StiIII
28 (27–28)
SgeIV
47 (45–50)
StiIV
34 (34–35)
StIV
57 (53–60)
fdl, teeth
21 (20–22)
mdl, teeth
23 (23–24)
shaft
21 (20–22)
branch
5 (5–6)
Amblyseius nyalensis El-Badry 1968: 322.
Euseius nyalensis, Moraes et al. 1986: 47, 2001: 40, 2004b: 72; Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 215, 2007: 121.
Euseius neotutsi Ueckermann 1992: 149 (synonymy according to Moraes et al. 2001).
The biology of this species remains unknown and this is its first record for the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 7 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ collected during this study, between 06/IV/2017 and 18/III/2018 in Yamoussoukro, Ngattakro (aasl 158 m, Lat 6°49′39.443″N; Long 5°17′21.635″W) on Carica papaya L
World distribution — Benin, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Yemen.
Remarks — The measurements of specimens from the Ivory Coast (Tables 17 and 18) are very close to those of specimens from other regions.
Download as Sources of measurements – Cape Verde: Ferragut & Baumann (2021); Senegal: Kade et al. (2011); Sudan Holotype: El-Badry (1968) in Ueckermann & Loots (1988); Yemen: Ueckermann & Loots (1988); Other African Countries (Benin: 13♀♀, Cameroon: 5♀♀, Ghana: 1♀, Sierra Leone: 5♀♀): Moraes et al. (2001); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (7) (this study)
Cape Verde (6)
Senegal (3)
Sudan (1) Holotype
Other African Countries (24)
Yemen (3)
dsl
347 (324–393)
343 (330–355)
339 (332–340)
330
339 (307– 387)
324–378
dsw s4
246 (225–258)
214 (205–227)
226 (215–235)
145
229 (208– 249)
211–221
dsw R1
230 (218–235)
–
–
–
–
–
j1
37 (35–39)
39 (37–42)
35 (33–35)
37
38 (34– 48)
33–35
j3
45 (43–48)
52 (48–57)
43 (38–48)
45
47 (38– 58)
46–47
j4
24 (18–28)
37 (32–46)
43 (38–50)
37
32 (16– 46)
28–35
j5
27 (25–28)
45 (40–52)
45 (43–48)
45
38 (16– 56)
38–41
j6
59 (56–63)
67 (64–71)
62 (62–65)
62
58 (43– 67)
54–59
J2
59 (53–63)
62 (59–67)
63 (62–65)
60
58 (43– 70)
54–57
J5
4 (4–5)
4 (4–6)
7 (5–8)
–
5 (3– 8)
4
r3
25 (24–26)
34 (32–38)
27 (25–29)
–
27 (16– 35)
22–24
R1
20 (18–21)
21 (20–23)
18 (17–20)
–
19 (14– 24)
19
s4
81 (80–83)
86 (81–90)
74 (62–85)
75
81 (69– 91)
71–72
S2
62 (48–65)
62 (56–67)
59 (48–65)
60
59 (46– 72)
54–58
S4
49 (46–50)
49 (46–53)
49 (45–55)
47
46 (35– 59)
38–44
S5
48 (45–50)
52 (50–55)
49 (47–50)
42
46(48– 59)
38–41
z2
37 (35–39)
42 (40–46)
37 (35–41)
37
39 (30– 48)
38
z4
56 (55–59)
63 (60–69)
55 (53–60)
52
56 (46– 67)
52–54
z5
14 (13–15)
63 (60–69)
18 (14–23)
17
17 (10– 35)
13–14
Z1
58 (55–60)
63 (61–68)
60 (55–64)
55
55 (35– 64)
54–55
Z4
58 (56–60)
57 (55–61)
61 (58–65)
57
57 (48– 67)
47–57
Z5
85 (78–90)
79 (76–81)
82 (80–83)
75
80 (70-91)
71–72
st1– st1
61 (60–61)
–
–
–
–
–
st2– st2
66 (63–70)
–
70 (67–75)
–
70 (62– 80)
91–101
st3– st3
86 (83–88)
–
–
–
–
–
st1– st3
66 (65–68)
–
65 (64–67)
–
63 (56– 70)
211–221
st4– st4
97 (93–105)
–
–
–
–
–
gensl
128 (125–133)
–
–
–
–
–
gensw st5
86 (83–90)
–
83 (81–87)
–
83 (72– 94)
88–98
gensw post. corn.
106 (103–113)
–
–
–
–
–
Lisl
23 (20–28)
–
–
–
–
–
Lisw
2 (2–3)
–
–
–
–
–
Sisl
10
–
–
–
–
–
Sisw
< 1
–
–
–
–
–
vsl
104 (90–113)
–
106 (102–110)
–
107 (96– 123)
95–l13
vsw post. corn.
52 (50–55)
–
64 (63–65)
–
53 (46– 64)
–
vsw anus
80 (76–83)
–
74 (72–76)
–
74 (62– 86)
69–79
gv3–gv3
31 (30–33)
–
–
–
–
–
JV5
48 (45–50)
–
–
–
–
41–47
scl
30 (25–35)
22 (20–22)
23 (20–25)
–
21 (11– 32)
–
scw
2 (1–2)
–
–
–
–
–
SgeI
35 (30–38)
–
31 (30–32)
30
33 (30– 37)
32-33
SgeII
32 (31–35)
33 (32–35)
32 (30–33)
27
31 (26– 32)
30-32
SgeIII
44 (40–47)
42 (40–44)
41 (40–42)
35
42 (38– 46)
41
StiIII
31 (30–33)
30 (29–30)
27 (25–28)
30
29 (24– 32)
28–30
SgeIV
61 (60–63)
63 (63–64)
59 (57–60)
–
60 (50– 69)
59–60
StiIV
41 (40–42)
44 (43–45)
36 (35–37)
45
40 (34– 48)
38–39
StIV
79 (76–80)
75 (74–76)
71 (70–73)
65
67 (48– 77)
66–67
fdl, No teeth
26 (25–28)
–, 5
–
–
–
–
mdl, No teeth
24 (23–25)
–, 1
–
–
–
–
Download as Sources of measurements – Cape Verde: Ueckermann (1992) but identified as E. neotutsi; Sudan: El-Badry (1968); Yemen: Ueckermann (1996); –: not reported.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Cape Verde (6)
Sudan (1)
Yemen (1)
dsl
250
239–262
263
261
dsw s4
175
139–165
165
180
dsw R1
200
–
–
–
j1
30
39–43
–
28
j3
35
39–43
–
38
j4
10
15–23
–
23
j5
13
23–26
–
26
j6
33
39–43
–
41
J2
28
32–34
–
38
J5
3
5–6
–
3
r3
20
23–26
–
21
R1
10
9–15
–
13
s4
55
–
–
55
S2
40
39–42
–
45
S4
28
28–30
–
27
S5
28
31–39
–
28
z2
28
35–37
–
30
z4
28
46–54
–
43
z5
9
12–15
–
11
Z1
28
39–40
–
41
Z4
28
31–39
–
38
Z5
55
54–57
–
50
st1–st1
54
–
–
–
st2–st2
65
82
–
110
st3–st3
65
–
–
–
st4–st4
55
–
–
–
st5–st5
40
–
–
–
st1–st5
123
131
–
128
vsl
93
92
–
98
vsw ant. corn.
163
146
–
161
Vsw anus
63
–
–
–
gv3-gv3
24
–
–
–
JV5
30
31
–
–
SgeI
30
–
–
32
SgeII
25
28–31
–
30
SgeIII
30
34–39
–
37
StiIII
28
26–28
–
25
SgeIV
50
48–54
–
50
StiIV
38
39–40
–
33
StIV
58
48–54
–
60
fdl, teeth
23
–
–
–
mdl, teeth
20
–
–
–
shaft
23
–
–
–
Branch
5
–
–
–
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) ovaloides Blommers 1974: 147.
Euseius ovaloides, Moraes et al. 1986: 51, 2004b: 78, Chant & McMurtry 2005b: 215, 2007:121.
Euseius ovaloides was described by Blommers (1974) from specimens collected on Citrus hystrix de Candolle (Rutaceae) and Persea americana Miller (Lauraceae) on Madagascar. Like all Euseius species, this species belongs to the type IV (pollinophagous generalist predators) of McMurtry and Croft (1997) and McMurtry et al. (2013). The species has been occasionally recorded from Madagascar (Blommers 1974), Papua-New Guinea (Schicha and Gutierrez 1985), Seychelles (Schicha 1987), La Réunion Island, (Quilici et al. 1997, 2000, Kreiter et al. 2020c), Guadeloupe, Martinique and Marie-Galante (Moraes et al. 2000; Kreiter et al. 2006) on various plants. Although its biology remains unknown, it is suspected to be a poor predator of tetranychid mites (Gutierrez and Etienne 1986) but can be considered as a potential predator of thrips and whiteflies. It is one of the most common species on La Réunion Island (Kreiter et al. 2020c). This is the first record of this species from the Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — a single specimen (1 ♂) collected during this study between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018 in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N; Long 3°55′00.60″W) on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Guadeloupe Island (France), Madagascar Island, Marie-Galante Island (France), Martinique Island (France), Mauritius Island, Mayotte Island (France), Papua New Guinea, La Réunion Island (France), Rodrigues Island (Mauritius), Seychelles Archipelago, Vietnam.
Remarks — The measurements of specimens from the Ivory Coast (table 19) are very close to those of specimens from other regions, with slightly longer dimensions, especially for the macrosetae, except for setae j1, which are shorter. The morphological and morphometric characters, as well as all measurements of our single male specimen fit well with measurements reported by Kreiter et al. (2020c).
This species was recently reported from Rodrigues and Mauritius Islands (Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf 2020a, b), Mayotte Island (Kreiter et al. 2020a), Vietnam (Kreiter et al. 2020b), and Grande Comore (Kreiter et al. 2021), all located in the Indian Ocean. But, E. ovaloides seems not reported from other African countries. This species was the second most collected species in a study conducted in Mauritius, compared to A. herbicolus (Kreiter & Abo-Shnaf 2020b) and it was also very common on La Réunion (Kreiter et al. 2020c) but less common in Mayotte and Grande Comore Islands (Kreiter et al. 2020a, 2021). In our study, only one specimen was collected.
Download as Sources of measurements – Guadeloupe: Moraes et al. (2000); La Réunion: Kreiter et al. (2020c); Papua-New-Guinea: Schicha & Gutierrez (1985); –: not provided.
Characters
Ivory Coast (1) (this study)
Guadeloupe (2)
La Réunion (4)
Papua-New Guinea (3)
dsl
250
254–259
243–268
247
dsw s4
167
186–189
190–214
157
dsw R1
175
–
–
–
j1
23
30–31
25–32
27
j3
10
8–9
9
8–9
j4
10
5–6
6
6–8
j5
8
5–6
6
6–8
j6
10
6
6
6–8
J2
10
6
6–8
6–8
J5
5
5
5–6
4
r3
12
9–11
9
9
R1
10
6
2024-08-06
7
s4
18
11–12
11–13
12
S2
10
6–8
6
7–8
S4
10
6
6
7–8
S5
9
6
6
7–8
z2
10
7–9
2024-09-06
8–9
z4
10
6–8
6
8–9
z5
8
4–6
6
6
Z1
10
6
6
7–8
Z4
11
6
6
6
Z5
45
40
35–41
38
st1–st1
50
–
–
–
st2–st2
60
–
–
–
st3–st3
55
–
–
–
st4–st4
45
–
–
–
st5–st5
33
–
–
–
st1–st5
105
–
–
–
vsl
90
88–90
85–101
90
vsw ant. corn.
143
130–136
126–154
150
vsw anus
53
–
–
–
gv3-gv3
18
–
–
19
JV5
15
–
–
–
SgeI
20
13–19
–
–
SgeII
20
13–14
–
–
SgeIII
25
22–24
–
22
StiIII
25
17
–
–
SgeIV
40
32–33
–
29
StiIV
33
30–31
–
27
StIV
53
47–50
–
44
fdl, No teeth
20
–
–
–
mdl, No teeth
20
–
–
–
shaft
23
–
22–25
18
branch
13
–
–
–
Before this paper, the fauna of Phytoseiidae of Ivory Coast was limited to five recorded species all belonging to the subfamily Amblyseiinae.
This paper reports on the results of a survey conducted recently (2017-2018) and adds 11 newly recorded species. The total number of Phytopseiidae species for the Ivory Coast now reaches to 16, all belonging to the subfamily Amblyseiinae.
Among these 16 species, several are already well-known as biological control agents (BCA). This must be underlined when new regulations on the importation of macro-organisms are proposed. The knowledge of the biodiversity, especially regarding efficient biological control agents, is of considerable importance not only for fundamental knowledge or conversation purposes but also for agricultural and economic reasons.
We thank the authorities of Nangui Abrogoua University headed by Professor Tano Yao, for the good management of our project. Thanks also to the entire team of the Plant Health Unit of Nangui Abrogoua University, for their great help to the completion of this work.
We also thank the papaya producers and agricultural cooperatives for facilitating the sampling of mites in papaya orchards.
We are also very grateful to Drs Edward A. Ueckermann and Ismaïl Döker for the review of an early version of this manuscript and very valuable comments, inducing great improvements. And to Dr Haralabos Tsolakis for the editing process of this paper.