1✉ Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina.
2División Aracnología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina & Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA, UBA-CONICET), Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina & Departamento de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional del Oeste, Belgrano 369 C1718, San Antonio de Padua, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2023 - Volume: 63 Issue: 1 pages: 201-219
https://doi.org/10.24349/aex4-l3kcThe mite genus Scatoglyphus was established by Berlese in 1913, with S. polytrematus as a type species, based on specimens collected in Florence, Italy, in chicken manure. Berlese (1913) included the genus in Astigmata, without referring to any family. Zachvatkin and Volgin (1956 cited in Schatz et al. 2011) erected the family Scatoglyphidae to accommodate this genus. Since the mention of this mite by Berlese, the genus was recorded in many habitats and localities from Asia, Europe, North America and north of Africa: chicken manure in USSR (Zakhvatkin 1941, cited in OConnor 2009), Egypt (El-Bishlawy 1989; Nasr Eldin 2017), Brazil (Barbosa et al. 2013), but also in an owl nest in USA (OConnor 2009); other findings extend their range to firewood, in China (Fang et al. 2021), pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) carcasses in a decomposition study in England (Rai et al. 2021), and ant nests in Argentina (Porta and Martínez 2010).
El-Bishlawy (1989) described Aegyptoglyphus arabicus, a species very close to S. polytrematus. Although, a comparative study of the types of both species is needed in order to establish the relationship between these taxa. As mentioned, there are two records of mites of the family Scatoglyphidae in South America, one in Argentina and one in Brazil. The finding in Argentina (Porta and Martínez 2010) was made during a sampling in nests of the ant Acromyrmex lundi (Guérin) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Buenos Aires city. These ants make their nests in live trees, excavating the trunk and leaving a visible opening in it. In some nests, a rich mite community was found, including many specimens of a new species of the genus Scatoglyphus. In this paper we describe Scatoglyphus myrmecophilus sp. nov., the second species known for the genus and family, including the first description of immatures instars of these mites.
Parque Avellaneda, an urban park in Buenos Aires city, Argentina, 34.64408°S, 58.47963°W (Fig. 1A). Habitat: Nests of fungus growing ant Acromyrmex lundi (Guérin-Méneville, 1838) (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini) located in the base of trunks of Ulmus minor Mill. (Ulmaceae) and Eucalyptus spp. L´Hér (Myrtaceae). The nests were exposed through wide, natural holes in the trunks (Figs. 1B-C). These holes were up to one meter high and 20 to 30 cm wide. The extraction of material was carried out from two trees. Sampling: Debris material of the external layer was extracted using a garden shovel. Samples, with a volume of around 500 cm³, were carried to the laboratory and specimens were extracted using Berlese funnels, without any source of light or heat, during five days. Collected specimens were preserved in alcohol 70% until their observation.
Collected specimens were preserved in alcohol 70% until their observation. Scatoglyphus specimens were sorted under a stereomicroscope; some specimens were cleared in lactic acid, heated to the flame of a burner, and mounted in excavated slides in the same medium to be observed in light microscopy; others were cleared in the same way, washed in water and mounted in permanent preparations with Heinze PVA as mounting medium. Drawings were made using a drawing tube attached to an Olympus CX31 microscope. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), specimens were dehydrated using critical point, mounted on individual stubs using adhesive copper tape, sputter-coated with gold–palladium and examined with a FEI XL 30 TMP scanning electron microscope varying at convenience the working distance and the voltage (15–22 kV).
All measurements are in micrometers, in brackets. Setal nomenclature of the body follows OConnor (2009), whereas for leg setation we follow Grandjean (1939).
Type-species: Scatoglyphus polytrematus Berlese, 1913
ZOOBANK: 8B9BC06D-8F54-4571-B5C4-A0B979341CE8
(N = 6, Figs. 2-4, 6A, 7-15B)
Size, color — Length = 360 (344-373), width = 201 (192-221); whitish in color.
Cuticle soft, with wrinkles, covered with granular cerotegument.
Body setae — Prodorsal setae in (mean = 20.5) claviform with coarse and digitiform barbs covering their surface; setae ex and ro (Figs. 3B-D) cylindrical and elongated (mean = 113.5 and 33, respectively) both barbulated. Prodorsal setae ex 6-8 times longer than in. Notogastral setae of the same type as setae in; setae of epimera III and IV and genital setae short and barbulated with setules only on the antiaxial side; setae on epimera1 and anal setae are setiform, without barbs.
Prodorsum — in and ex setal insertionson cuticular elevations. Prodorsal ridges delimiting a round area anteriad of in. From this area to the rostrum, there are four symmetric depressions (Fig. 3A, C, D). Seta ro inserted in the external margin of the rostrum and directed forward (Fig. 3B). Outline of the prodorsum abruptly narrowed at its middle, delimiting a narrow rostrum (Fig. 3D).
Notogaster — Subrectangular in shape, lateral sides slightly convex and a truncated distal end (Fig. 2), separated from the prodorsum by deep sejugal furrow. Coarse furrows evident, delimiting a central area and an anterior trapezoidal area (Figs. 2, 3A). Ten pairs of notograstral clavate setae present: c1 (34), c2 (30.8), cp (33.3), c3 (35), d1 (45.6), d2 (42.1), e1 (45.6), e2 (41.6), h1 (55.3) and h2 (39.8). A pair of colorless, fusiform opisthonotal glands (gla) present (Fig. 6A).
Venter — Apodemes I fused in a Y with distinct sternum; apodemes II not touching medially (Fig. 4B). Other apodemes inconspicuous. Setae 1a (20-25) thin, setiform; setae 3a, 4a and 4b, small (19), petiolated and barbed. Egg-laying opening in inverted U, covered by a single flap that has a medial keel in basal two thirds (Figs. 4A, 7A). This flap is joined to the ventral wall by its inferior border, opening out and down. Pseudovipositor (terminal portion of reproductive tract) plicated and attached to the internal border of the genital flap. Genital papillae long and narrow, subdivided in a long shaft and a small, spherical head. Egg-laying opening flanked by one pair of adgenital setae (g), barbed (15) (Fig. 7). Anal aperture close to the egg-laying opening, covered by paired flaps and surrounded by six pairs of thin, setiform setae (19-28), as long as the distance between its posterior margin and the opening of spermathecal pore. Copulatory opening in a strongly sclerotized tube, directed backwards (Figs. 4-6), with a pair of barbed setae (p) flanking it. Copulatory opening and setae p located in a quadrangular area outlined by wrinkles. Setae h3 observable in posterior portion of the ventral surface.
Gnathosoma — ventral surface smooth, with mentum, genae, pseudorutella and lips indistinctly fused (Fig. 8C). Setae m 24 long. Pseudorutellae narrow; between them, fused lips appear as a small bell-shaped protrusion (Fig. 8C). Palps simple, their articulation with infracapitulum flexible; with a keel emerging ventrally at the level of this joint (Figs. 8A-B). Basal segment of palp with two setae, distal with one dorsal seta, solenidion ω and two eupathidia are observable, as tiny papillae, in its distal end (Figs. 8A-B). Supracoxal spine (e) 8 long (Fig. 8A). Grandjean´s organ branched, 50 long (Figs. 8A, C). Chelicerae chelate dentate.
Legs — (Figs. 9-15B) – Strongly sclerotized. Thick cuticle with two kinds of cuticular extrusions: slim keels and heavy folds. Keels are located in the dorsal side of tarsi I, III and IV, folds are restricted to lateral sides of tibiae and tarsi. Solenidion σ of genu I (100-111) inserted at the distal end of a fold (Fig. 10B). Solenidia of the other genua shorter than I (GeII = 83-92, GeIII = 30, GeIV = 15).
Legs setae – Setae p, q, u and v leaf-shaped, striated and parallel to the surface of the segment. Setae s and spiniform, striated and projected. Remaining setae setiform and either smooth or more or less barbed; setae w and r of tarsus IV (Figs. 13B, 15) setiform and smooth.
Legs chaetotaxy – (from trochanters to tarsi, from leg I to IV): (1-1-2-2-14) (0-1-2-2-11) (1-0-1-1-10) (0-1-0-1-10).
Legs solenidiotaxy – (from genua to tarsi, from leg I to IV): (1-1-3) (1-1-1) (0-1-0) (0-1-0).
(N = 2, Figs. 5, 6B, 15)
Size, color — Length = 333 (319-346), width = 183 (162-204); whitish in color.
Prodorsum and notogaster: as in the female.
Venter — (Fig. 5) – Epimeral region as in female. Genital aperture in an inverted V, covered with a single, triangular valve; genital apparatus extrusible, with a complicated frame, including sclerites and thin, curved, aedeagus (Figs. 5, 6B; arrow). One pair of barbed genital setae g present. Anal opening surrounded by four pairs of setiform setae (19) and close to genital one. Setae p and h3 short and barbed, inserted in roughly rectangular area posterior to anal aperture.
Legs — Similar to female, except tarsus IV (Fig. 15C-E) with setae e and d modified as suckers.
(N = 3, Figs. 16A-B, D)
Length = 151 (131-173), width = 91 (88.5-102). Setae ex (30.6), in (9.7) and ro (17.7) barbed. Body segments C-F could be inferred from transversal humps and dorsal setal pairs (c1, c2, cp, c3, d1, d2 and e1). Setae e2 and h1 inserted on two pairs of tubercles directed backwards.
The Claparède organ shaped as a long (15 long) and narrow tube, ending in a small ball. One pair of setiform setae on paraproctal segment (pseudanal).
Leg chaetotaxy: as in adults, except for the lack of setae pR in trochanters I and II, and setae sR in trochanters III.
Dehiscence line transdehiscent observable in one specimen.
(N = 2, Fig. 16C)
Length = 230 (219-240), width = 124 (115-133).
General aspect as adults. Setae ex, in and ro barbed, their lengths 72.6, 12.1 and 20.2, respectively. Notogaster with nine pairs of setae. One pair of short, setiform adgenital setae. Four pairs of setiform adanal setae. Legs, although not so sclerotized as in adults, show dorsal keels in tarsi III and IV. Leg chaetotaxy as in adults, except for the lack of setae in trochanters and for reduced setation of leg IV (0-0-0-0-7); setae s, e and f lacking.
Unknown
(N = 3, Fig. 16E)
Length = 278 (269-283), width = 147 (140-150).
General aspect as adults. Notogaster with nine pairs of setae. One pair of short, setiform adgenital setae. Adanal setation is open to two interpretations. Hypothesis 1 considers four pairs of adanal setae surrounding anal opening, as in the protonymph, but the pair ad1 change from setiform in N1 to barbed in N3 (Fig. 16E, abbreviations in brackets). Hypothesis 2 considers a reduction of adanal setae from 4 in N1 to 3 in N3. So, barbed setae distal to ad1 are p; besides that, pair h3 is added ventrally. Leg chaetotaxy as in adults.
Common setal pattern in the prodorsum includes pairs ex, in and le, since the larvae. However, in some cases, vestiges of pair le (ve) could be observed in front of in setae, as a tiny pore and a vestigial seta; even, in a male, a complete seta with alveolus was observed in one side of the prodorsum.
Holotype (MACN-Ar 42858), female; Argentina: Buenos Aires city: Parque Avellaneda, 34.64408°S, 58.47963°W; 15.Mar.2022; A.O. Porta leg.; collected using Berlese funnels in nets of Acromyrmex lundi in trunks of Ulmus minor, preserved in alcohol; paratype (MACN-Ar 42859), male, same data as holotype, preserved in alcohol; 1 tube with 10 paratypes (MACN-Ar 42860), 6 females and 4 males, same data as holotype, preserved in alcohol; 15 paratypes (MACN-Ar 42861), adults, in stubs for SEM, same as holotype, 30.Nov.2021; 10 paratypes (MACN-Ar 42862), adults, in stubs for SEM, same as holotype, May.2009, in nest of Acromyrmex lundi in trunks of Eucalyptus sp.; four paratypes female, two larvae, one larval skin, one protonymph, three tritonymphs, same data as holotype, in definitive preparations in Heinze PVA medium, in the main author collection.
The specific name comes from Greek ''myrmeco-'' (ant) and ''-philus'' (beloved), refers to this species living in ant nests
Adults of Scatoglyphus myrmecophilus sp. nov. are distinguishable from those of S. polytrematus Berlese in the following characters: ratio between the lengths of setae ex and in 6-8, versus less than 4 in S. polytrematus (see OConnor 2009, Fig. 16.27C); hysterosomal dorsal ridges evident (Fig. 2), versus not evident in S. polytrematus; setae 3a petiolated and barbed (Figs. 3B-5), versus setiform and smooth in S. polytrematus (see OConnor 2009, Figs. 16.27C-D); female genital flap in inverted U (Figs. 4, 7) versus in inverted V in S. polytrematus; female with pore directed backwards (Figs. 4A, 6A); setae w and r of tarsus IV (Figs. 13B, 15A-B) setiform and smooth versus petiolate and barbed in S. polytrematus (see OConnor 2009, Fig. 16.27C-D).
Variations of prodorsal setation mentioned above are indicative of a process of setal instability in the phylogenetic time. This kind of variation was called vertition by Grandjean (1952) who considered it a manifestation in the ontogeny of an orthogenetic process of fixation or disappearance of a character state. The position of the vestigial pair le is also remarkable. This pair, named ve in classical astigmatan nomenclature, is usually placed lateral and posteriorly to vi (ro). In S. myrmecophilus sp. nov. vestigial setae have a typical ''oribatid'' position, i.e. in the central area of the prodorsum. Considering the accepted hypothesis of the origin of Astigmata from Oribatida (Zachvatkin 1953, cited by Norton 1998; OConnor 1984), more specifically from a nothroid group (Griffiths et al. 1990; Norton 1994, 1998), these vestigial setae positioned in the middle of prodorsum can be taken as another supporting evidence of that origin. In the actual evolutive time, these setae are regressive, but we can hypothesize that they were fully developed in that position in the past, as occur in nothroid taxa.
The ontogenetic development of the caudal region of S. myrmecophilus could be resumed as follows: the larva (Fig. 16B) presents a pair of pseudanal setae, p, in the paraproctal segment (PS); in the protonymph (Fig. 16C), an adanal segment (AD), with four pairs of setae is added; then, no paraproctal segments are added. As discussed above, adanal setation in tritonymphs could be interpreted in two ways: 1) the four pairs surrounding anal opening (three setiform and one barbed) are all adanal, and the barbed pair between them and h2 are setae p or 2) the three setiform pairs around anal opening are adanal (one pair less than in protonymphs), barbed, distal pair is p, and the barbed pair between them and h2 is h3, added in that instar. From a second interpretation, one adanal pair is added in males and three pairs are added in females, in a case of polytrichosis. In light microscope observations, a pair of supposed lips, internal to the adanal segment, can be seen in nymphs and adults. One explanation is that internal lips are actually the last portion of the digestive tract. In other words, the anamorphosis process stops in the adanal segment. According to Griffiths et al. (1990) ''...[in Astigmata] there is no evidence that segment AN ever forms and it is doubtful that it does''. Another possibility, supported by Norton's (1990) assertions regarding Astigmata, is that such pair of apparent lips, represent a regressive anal segment, that have lost its setae and lyrifissures, as well as any sclerotization.
In the development of anal region, there are also changes in setal morphology. Whereas pseudanal setae p in larva are thin and smooth, they are barbed in the subsequent instars. The presence of a pair of setae in paraproctal segment of the larva (PS) is very unusual in Astigmata.
Leg setae formulae of S. myrmecophilus sp. nov. corresponds to the common condition in Astigmata (Grandjean, 1939). With respect to the solenidiotaxy, S. myrmecophilus sp. nov. presents some differences with respect to the normal condition: the new species present only one solenidion in genu I and none in genu III. This condition was also recorded by Grandjean (1939) in other Astigmata (e.g. Chortoglyphus), and were considered as a deficiency (déficience) by him.
The presence of a famulus on tarsi II is another astonishing finding (Fig. 12D-E). This condition was only cited from Palaeosomata (Grandjean 1957; Norton 1977), the most basal group of Oribatida (Grandjean 1953). To find it in a highly derivative group as Astigmata is unexplained. Their presence is not constant, as said above. It was observed only in one tarsus of one specimen, observed in scanning electron microscope. Unlike the case of lamellar setae, the occurrence of a vertition, presence of famulus in tarsi II could be interpreted as a mutation (sensu Grandjean 1952). This phenomenon, studied in oribatids by Grandjean, has no pattern, it can simply mean the random reappearance of a long-vanished character. Although we do not have a clear explanation, one thing is evident: S. myrmecophilus sp. nov. is a mosaic of modern and ancestral traits. And this ancestry goes back not only to its most recent possible relatives but to the very roots of the Acariformes.
The samples, taken at different times of the year, were always dominated by adults, in a ratio of 4 to 1 with respect to immatures. The sex ratio was nearly 1:1. Deutonymphs were not collected. Is this stage absent in the life cycle? Taking into consideration the stability of the nest, with conditions of humidity and temperature regulated by the ants, one possibility is that a phoretic stage, ready to disperse to new habitats, would not be an evolutive advantage. However, heteromorphic deutonymphs stages are present in some astigmatans associated with hymenopters that presumably have stable levels of humidity and temperature in their nest (e.g., for bees, Okabe and Makino 2002; Klimov et al. 2007; for ants, Sokolov et al. 2003; Campbell et al. 2013). A second possibility is that production of phoretic deutonymphs is restricted to the short period of time when some members of the ant colony migrate to establish new nests.
The phylogenetic relationships of Scatoglyphus are also inconclusive to support the absence of deutonymphs. According to Fang et al. (2021), who studied the mitochondrial genome of S. polytrematus, scatoglyphids are related to species of Acaridae of the genera Rhizoglyphus, Caloglyphus, Aleuroglyphus and Tyrophagus. Of these taxa, the first two genera have deutonymphs, while all species of Aleuroglyphus and most of Tyrophagus do not.
To Dr. Barry OConnor (University of Michigan) for providing bibliography in the initial stages of the study. To Dr. Marina Barbosa (ESALQ/USP) for providing information about the Brazilian species of Scatoglyphus. To three anonymous reviewers who carefully read the manuscript and whose corrections and suggestions helped to clearly improve it. We want to thank specially to Dr. Tobias Pfingstl for his work as editor of this manuscript.