Castro-López, Mayerly Alejandra¹ ; Ramírez-Godoy, Augusto² ; Martínez Osorio, Wilson³ and Rueda-Ramírez, Diana⁴

¹✉ Departamento de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 45 # 26-85, Bogotá D.C.-Colombia & Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC), Avenida Central del Norte 39-115, Tunja-Boyacá-Colombia.
²Departamento de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 45 # 26-85, Bogotá D.C.-Colombia.
³Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC), Avenida Central del Norte 39-115, Tunja-Boyacá-Colombia.
⁴Departamento de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 45 # 26-85, Bogotá D.C.-Colombia & Explora Agrotecnologia, Chía, Colombia.

2021 - Volume: 61 Issue: 2 pages: 394-402

Original research

Keywords

Abstract

Introduction

Thrips tabaci Lindeman is one of the main onion (Allium cepa L.) pests in Colombia as well as in several other countries (Rueda et al. 2007; Riley et al. 2011; Pal et al. 2019), due to its invasive capacity, high mobility and polyphagous behavior (Smith et al. 2011). The damage is caused by the feeding of nymphs and adults, which result in the appearance of silvery spots on the leaves that turn into white blotches, followed by the development of silvery patches and leaf curling (Waiganjo et al. 2008; Munoz et al. 2014). These injuries result in reduced photosynthesis (Jensen et al. 2003) and decreases in bulb size (Waiganjo et al. 2008). In addition, this species, as well as Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (tobacco thrips), a less common species, have been reported as vectors of the Iris Yellow Spot Virus (IYSV) in onions, garlic, chives, leeks and several ornamentals (Srinivasan et al. 2012; Bag et al. 2015).

Worldwide, T. tabaci is controlled mainly by sprays of synthetic insecticides (Foster et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2014). However, given the pupal developmental stages are normally found in the litter or the topsoil layer (1.5–2.0 cm) (Tommasini and Maini 1995), these can be hidden and not affected by the applied insecticide (Cannon et al. 2007). This has led growers to intensify insecticide use, negatively affecting the environment, human health and promoting the selection of resistant thrips populations (Herron et al. 2008; Nazemi et al. 2016). In an attempt to break that cycle, alternative control strategies have been evaluated, as the use of biological control.

Soil Mesostigmata are a diverse mite group, where numerous species are predators of small arthropods and nematodes (Lindquist et al. 2009; Carrillo et al. 2015). Mesostigmatid mites have been shown to prey on pre-pupae and pupae thrips (Wiethoff et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2014; Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018, 2019), which would interrupt the cycle of these organisms, thereby preventing their return to the plants. Recent studies reported species of soil-dwelling predaceous mesostigmatids of the families Laelapidae and Parasitidae in onion growing areas of the Colombian Department of Boyacá (Castro-López 2018). Hence, it is presumable that some of these species play a natural role in thrips control in that region or could be utilized for that purpose.

One of the mesostigmatid species collected, Gaeolaelaps aculeifer (Canestrini) (Laelapidae), has been mass produced and commercialized in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania for applied biological control of pest species, including thrips (Knapp et al. 2018; van Lenteren et al. 2018). It has been reported that each female of a Colombian population of this predator (collected in the Department of Cundinamarca) is able to consume daily 2.6 pre-pupae/pupae of the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018). Previously, Berndt et al. (2004b) reported predation of G. aculeifer on F. occidentalis on substrate soil, and Navarro-Campos et al. (2012) on the thrips Pezothrips kellyanus (Bagnall) in citrus.

Parasitus bituberosus Karg (Parasitidae), found in Europe, Africa, Asia (Karg, 1972), and recently in Colombia (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2019, 2021), is also a potential biological control agent. This species is reported to prey on fly larvae, (Al-Amidi and Downes 1990; Al-Amidi et al. 1991; Szafranek et al. 2013) nematodes (Szafranek et al. 2013; Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2019) and pygmephorid mites (Szafranek et al. 2013). In Colombia it was recently reported to prey daily 4.4 pre-pupae and pupae of F. occidentalis (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2019), suggesting that it could be evaluated on other thrips species.

As the predation of G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus on T. tabaci has not been evaluated, the objective of this study was to determine their predation and oviposition rates on T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae under laboratory conditions.

Material and Methods

This study was conducted between August of 2017 and February of 2018, at the Entomology Laboratory of the Biological Crop Management Group (GMBC), Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia.

Stock colonies

About 10 months before starting the experiments, specimens of G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus were collected from the rhizosphere of onion plants in the municipalities of Duitama (5°48'40.75'' N, 73°0'46.908'' W), Tibasosa (5°44'52.15'' N, 72°59'28.18'' W) and Nobsa (5°47ˈ56.33'' N, 72°58'39.11'' W) in the Department of Boyacá, and in soil of rose crops in the municipalities of Cogua (05°03'23.3'' N, 073°55'44.4'' W), Guasca (04°50'38.3'' N, 073°53'07.9'' W), Nemocón (05°07'03.1–03.2'' N, 073°51'31.7–31.9'' W) and Tocancipa (04°59'19.3'' N, 073°54'15.9'' W), in the Department of Cundinamarca, Colombia.

These mites were used to establish stock colonies in rearing units modified from Abbatiello (1965) and Freire and Moraes (2007). Each unit consisted of a plastic container (10 cm diameter x 7 cm high), whose bottom was covered with a layer of a plaster made of a mixture of nine parts gypsum and one part activated charcoal. Gaeolaelaps aculeifer was fed with a mixture of all developmental stages of the mite Aleuroglyphus ovatus (Troupeau) (Sarcoptiformes, Astigmatina, Acaridae) reared on crushed commercial dog food (Purina®; nutritional content: 9% fat, 12% moisture, 8% ash and 25% protein). Parasitus bituberosus was fed with Rhabditella axei nematodes reared on decomposing bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and a mixture of all developmental stages of A. ovatus. The units were maintained in a growth chamber, in the dark, at 19 ± 3 °C, 60 ± 10% RH. The units were closed with a piece of plastic film and maintained permanently moist by daily addition of distilled water.Thrips tabaci pre-pupae and pupae were obtained from a colony started with adult specimens collected from onion plants. The identification of the thrips species was confirmed by a Thysanoptera specialist, Dr. Everth Ebrat Ravelo. The colonies were maintained as described by López et al. (2007), in transparent plastic containers (11 cm diameter x 9 cm high), with bottom covered with a thin layer of cotton overlaid by a sheet of paper towel maintained humid daily with distilled water. Germinated faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds were placed onto the towel to serve as a substrate for insect feeding and oviposition. Each container was sealed with a transparent plastic film, to prevent thrips from escaping, and maintained in a growth chamber in the dark, at 19 ± 3 ºC and 60 ± 10 % RH.

Experimental procedure

For each predatory mites, three treatments were evaluated: a daily density of six, eight and ten of T. tabaci pre-pupae or pupae as prey. The experimental unit consisted of a plastic Petri dishes (4 cm diameter, 1.3 cm high), whose bottom was covered with plaster as previously described for the mite rearing units. Thirty gravid females of 3–8-day-old each mite species per treatment were individually transferred from the stock colony to each experimental unit, creating 30 repetitions for each treatment and species.

Experimental units with P. bituberosus were evaluated daily for eight days, while units with G. aculeifer for ten days. The differences in the evaluation time of these two species were due to differences in their longevity (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018, 2019). Units were evaluated counting the number of consumed prey and laid eggs. Consumed and non-consumed prey were replaced by new ones after each evaluation. Daily eggs laid were transferred into new containers and maintained until larval emergence, to assess egg viability. Experiments were conducted at controlled laboratory conditions identical to those previous described for mite colony maintenance.

Statistical analysis

Mean daily predation and oviposition rates, and mean egg viability (proportion of eggs hatched/female) were calculated. The predation rate was analyzed with a two-way (2 x 2) analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a factorial design, with three prey densities (densities of six, eight and ten T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae provided daily per unit) and predators (G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus) as factors, as normality and homoscedasticity assumptions were met. Oviposition and egg viability were analyzed with a generalized linear model (GLM) with treatment and predator as factors and a quasi-binomial distribution. Post hoc Tukey's test was used for testing differences between means considering the best fit model. Statistical analyses were performed using the R program (Packages ExpDes.pt, lme4, multcomp and ggplot2, version 3.6.2, The R foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019-12-12).

Results

Predation rate

Significant differences in predation rates were observed between prey densities (F = 311.6, d.f. = 2, P < 0.0005) but not between predator species at any prey density (F = 1.3, d.f. = 1, P = 0.25). Number of consumed preys was highest when ten prey were offered daily to G. aculeifer and to P. bituberosus.

For both species, predation rate increased with increasing prey density. The number of consumed individuals of T. tabaci pre-pupae / pupae by G. aculeifer was 6.8 ± 0.52, 6.4 ± 0.39 and 5.1 ± 0.33 and by P. bituberosus was 6.9 ± 0.45, 6.2 ± 0.35 and 5.1 ± 0.28 when ten, eight and six prey were offered daily, respectively. However, statistically predation rate of both predators did not tend to increase above a density of eight pre-pupae/pupae of T. tabaci, with a smaller difference between predation at eight and ten than between six and eight (Figure 1).

Oviposition rate

Significant differences were observed between predator species (Chi² = 1871.8, d.f. = 1, P < 2 x 10^-16) and between prey densities (Chi² = 286.3, d.f. = 2, P < 2 x 10^-16) in relation to oviposition (Figure 2). No significant differences were observed for the interaction of the factors.

Considering the predatory mite species and the prey density, the highest daily oviposition was observed for P. bituberosus (6.9 ± 0.26 eggs/female/day) when the offered prey density was 10 pre-pupae/pupae, and the lowest for G. aculeifer (3.6 ± 0.36 eggs/female/day) when the offered prey density was 6 pre-pupae/pupae of T. tabaci. The highest daily oviposition for G. aculeifer (4.4 ± 0.25 eggs/female/day) was also observed when the offered prey density was 10 pre-pupae/pupae of T. tabaci. A significant positive correlation was observed between daily oviposition rate and the number of T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae preyed by both predators (r = 0.8, P < 0.001 and r = 0.53, P < 0.001 for P. bituberosus and G. aculeifer, respectively).

Mean egg viability

Significant differences between the viability of eggs produced by females offered different prey densities were recorded (Chi² = 22.02, d.f. = 2, P = 1.65 x 10^-5), but no significant differences were observed between predator species (Figure 3). Viability was lowest (86 ± 5.8 %) for G. aculeifer offered six prey day compared to other combinations of predator and prey densities, which did not differ significantly among themselves (< 91%).

Discussion

Results of this study contributed to assess the predation potential of G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus on T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae. Predation rates of G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus on T. tabaci were higher than those reported for laelapid species feeding on F. occidentalis. Specifically, Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Womersley) consumed 2.13 ± 0.1 prey/day (Park et al. 2021) and 4.5 ± 0.42 prey/day (Wu et al. 2014), G. aculeifer 2.93 ± 0.1 prey/day (Park et al. 2021) and 3.5 ± 0.5 prey/day (Berndt et al. 2004b), G. aculeifer (the same strain used in the present study) 2.6 ± 0.1 prey/day (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018), Stratiolaelaps miles (Berlese) 1.6 ± 0.3 prey/day (Berndt et al. 2004a) and Cosmolaelaps jaboticabalensis (Moreira, Klompen and Moraes) 2.6 ± 1.1 prey/day (Moreira et al. 2015). In addition, Park et al. (2021) reported predation rate of G. aculeifer and S. scimitus of 2.4 ± 0.1 and 2.0 ± 0.1 prey/day when these species were fed with F. intonsa (Tryborn), and of 3.3 ± 0.1 and 3.4 ± 0.1 when fed on Thrips palmi (Karny), respectively. The species G. aculeifer, S. scimitus and S. miles are commercialized for the control of F. occidentalis (Knapp et al. 2018). Rueda-Ramírez et al. (2019) reported a daily predation of 4.4 ± 0.2 F. occidentalis pre-pupae/pupae per female of the same population of P. bituberosus used in the present study.

In summary, for both G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus, predation in the current study on T. tabaci was approximately 1.6 times higher than F. occidentalis in the cited studies. These differences in predation rate may be related to characteristics of T. tabaci. Shaikh et al. (2015) reported the length of pre-pupae and pupae of T. tabaci to be respectively 0.91 ± 0.10 mm and 0.96 ± 0.12 mm, whereas Cárdenas and Corredor (1989) reported for F. occidentalis length of respectively about 1.1 mm and 1.3 mm. The smaller size of T. tabaci could account for the greater predation rate than the former. However, in addition to size, other factors could be involved, resulting from the metabolism of organic acids as glutamic, malic, citric, in onion plants (Rodríguez-Galdón et al. 2008). These hypotheses need to be further explored.

The oviposition rates of G. aculeifer were higher when fed on T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae than the rates reported by Rueda-Ramírez et al. (2018), Navarro-Campos et al. (2016) and Berndt et al. (2004a) when this species was fed with F. occidentalis (about 2.9 ± 0.1,2.2 and 2.5 ± 0.87 eggs/female/day, respectively). Another laelapid species as C. jaboticabalensis, only laid 0.2 eggs/female/day (Moreira et al. 2015) and S. miles with 0.8 ± 0.53 eggs/female/day when fed F. occidentalis. In the case of P. bituberosus, the oviposition rate was lower than that reported by Rueda-Ramírez et al. (2019) when F. occidentalis pre-pupae/pupae was offered as prey (8.9 ± 0.8 eggs/female/day). The oviposition capacity depends on several factors, among which the nutritional content of the food source and the use of resources to extend longevity in presence of nutrient-poor or stressful conditions for predatory species (Gotoh and Tsuchiya 2008). Both factors need to be analyzed. McMurtry (1982) indicated that the growth capacity of a population is only one feature determining the performance of a biological control agent; several other factors may influence the efficacy of predators such as intraguild predation, competition, response to abiotic environmental factors, functional and numerical response, and others (Skirvin and Fenlon 2001; Gontijo et al. 2012), thus further experiments should be performed. The difficulty in obtaining large numbers of T. tabaci to conduct this study hampered the possibility to evaluate a larger array of prey densities or a larger number of replicates. Under greenhouse conditions, a reduction of 78% and 72% were observed in the population of T. tabaci in the presence of G aculeifer and P. bituberosus, respectively in onion plants (Castro-López and Martínez-Osorio 2021). However, complementary field studies should be conducted to explore other possibilities, including the association of T. tabaci pre-pupae and pupae with other food sources such as nematodes (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2019; Azevedo et al. 2019, 2020), naturally found in agricultural ecosystems (Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018, 2019). The use of entomopathogenic fungi in combination with predatory mites has shown good potential, as shown in the study conducted by Saito and Brownbridge (2016), in which mortality of thrips was higher than 90%. These complementary studies should lead to the practical use of G. aculeifer and or P. bituberosus in Colombia where thrips species are still controlled primarily with insecticides.

In conclusion, while previous studies reported on the predation of G. aculeifer and P. bituberosus of edaphic phases of thrips species (Berndt et al. 2004a; Navarro-Campos et al. 2012; Rueda-Ramírez et al. 2018, 2019), this is the first study demonstrating the predation capacity on T. tabaci pre-pupae/pupae.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Gobernación de Boyacá and Minciencias (Cov. 733) for the financial support of this research. We also want to thank Everth Ebratt Ravelo for confirming the thrips identification, Lynn Carta for confirming the nematodes identification and Miguel Galan for the assistance with field collection of thrips and mites. To Gilberto J. de Moraes for reviewing the previous version of this manuscript and his valuable suggestions and comments.

References

1. Abbatiello M.J. 1965. A culture chamber for rearing soil mites. Turtox News. 43: 162-164. doi:10.1021/cen-v043n041.p162
2. Al-Amidi A.H.K., Downes M.J. 1990. Parasitus bituberosus (Acari: Parasitidae), a possible agent for biological control of Heteropeza pygmaea (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in mushroom compost. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 8: 13-25. doi:10.1007/BF01193378
3. Al-Amidi A.H.K., Dunne R., Downes M.J. 1991. Parasitus bituberosus (Acari: Parasitidae): An agent for control of Lycoriella solani (Diptera: Sciaridae) in mushroom crops. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 11: 159-166. doi:10.1007/BF01246088
4. Azevedo L., Leite L., Chacon-Orozco J., Moreira M., Ferreira M., Cano L., Borges V., Rueda-Ramírez D., De Moraes G., Palevsky E. 2019. Free living nematodes as alternative prey for soil predatory mites: an interdisciplinary case study of conservation biological control. Biol. Control., 132: 128-134. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.02.007
5. Azevedo L., Moreira M.F.P., Pereira G.G., Borges V., Moraes G.J. de, Inomoto M.M., Vicente M.H., Siqueira Pinto M. de, Peres L.E.P., Rueda-Ramírez D., Carta L., Meyer S.L.F., Mowery J., Bauchan G., Ochoa R., Palevsky E. 2020. Combined releases of soil predatory mites and provisioning of free-living nematodes for the biological control of root-knot nematodes on 'Micro Tom tomato'. Biol. Control., 146: 1-4. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104280
6. Bag S., Schwartz H.F., Cramer C.S., Harvey M.J., Pappu H.R. 2015. Iris yellow spot virus (Tospovirus: Bunyaviridae): from obscurity to research priority. Mol. Plant. Pathol., 16(3): 224-237. doi:10.1111/mpp.12177
7. Berndt O., Poehling H., Meyhöfer R. 2004a. Predation capacity of two predatory laelapid mites on soil-dwelling thrips stages. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 112: 107-115. doi:10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00185.x
8. Berndt O., Meyhöfer R., Poehling H.M. 2004b. The edaphic phase in the ontogenesis of Frankliniella occidentalis and comparison of Hypoaspis miles and Hypoaspis aculeifer as predators of soil-dwelling thrips stages. Biol. Control., 30: 17-24. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.09.009
9. Cannon R.J., Matthews L., Collins D.W. 2007. A review of the pest status and control options for Thrips palmi. Crop. Prot., 26(8): 1089-1098. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2006.10.023
10. Cárdenas E., Corredor D. 1989. Biología del Trips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pegande) (Thysanoptera: thripidae) sobre Crisantemo Chrysanthemum morifolium l. bajo condiciones de laboratorio. Agron. Colomb., 6(1-2): 71-77.
11. Carrillo D., de Moraes G.J., Pena J.E. (Eds.) 2015. Prospects for biological control of plant feeding mites and other harmful organisms. Progress in Biological Control 19; Cham: Springer. pp. xiv + 328pp. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15042-0
12. Castro-López M. 2018. Ácaros Mesostigmata como potenciales controladores de Thrips tabaci Lindeman en el cultivo de cebolla Allium cepa L. MSc thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, DC.
13. Castro-López M., Martínez-Osorio J. 2021. Response of Allium cepa L. under the presence of Gaeolaelaps aculeifer Canestrini and Parasitus bituberosus Karg to control Thrips tabaci Lindeman. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic., 15(1): e11001. doi:10.17584/rcch.2021v15i1.11001
14. Freire R.A., Moraes G.J. 2007. Mass production of the predatory mite Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Womersley) (Acari: Laelapidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 12: 117-119. doi:10.11158/saa.12.2.4
15. Foster S.P., Gorman K., Denholm I. 2010. English field samples of Thrips tabaci show strong and ubiquitous resistance to deltamethrin. Pest. Manag. Sci., 66(8): 861-864. doi:10.1002/ps.1953
16. Gontijo L.M., Nechols J.R., Margolies D.C. Cloyd R. A. 2012. Plant architecture and prey distribution influence foraging behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Exp. Appl. Acarol., 56(1): 23-32. doi:10.1007/s10493-011-9496-7
17. Gotoh T., Tsuchiya A. 2008. Food scarcity reduces female longevity of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 47: 249-256. doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9215-1
18. Herron G.A., James T.M., Rophail J., Mo J. 2008. Australian densities of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), are resistant to some insecticides used for their control. Aust. J. Entomol., 47: 361-364. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.2008.00669.x
19. Jensen L., Simko B., Shock C.C., Saunders L.D. 2003. A two-year study on alternative methods for controlling onion thrips (Thrips tabaci L.) in Spanish onions. Or. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Spec. Rep., 1048: 94-106.
20. Karg W. 1972. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Parasitus Latreille, 1795 (Acarina, Parasitiformes) aus Komposterden und Gurkenkulturen. Dtsch. Entomol. Z., 19: 55-63. doi:10.1002/mmnd.19720190108
21. Knapp M., van Houten Y., van Baa E., Groot T. 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia, 58(Suppl): 72-82. doi:10.24349/acarologia/20184275.
22. Lindquist E.E., Krantz G.W., Walter D.E. 2009. Order Mesostigmata. In: A manual of Acarology, Krantz, G.W. Walter, D.E. (eds) A manual of acarology, 3rd edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock. pp. 124-232.
23. López-Olguín J.F.A., Aragón G.A.M., Tapia R. 2007. Técnica de laboratorio para la cría de Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Avances en agroecología y ambiente, publicación especial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 1: 327-336.
24. McMurtry J.A. 1982. The Use of Phytoseiids for Biological Control: Progress and Future Prospects, in Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae, ed. M.A. Hoy, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Univ. Calif. Pub., 3284: 23-39.
25. Moreira G.F., Morais M.R., Busoli A.C., Moraes G.J. 2015. Life cycle of Cosmolaelaps jaboticabalensis (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and two factitious food sources. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 65: 219-226. doi:10.1007/s10493-014-9870-3
26. Munoz R.M., Lerma M.L., Lunello P., Schwartz H.F. 2014. Iris yellow spot virus in Spain: incidence, epidemiology and yield effect on onion crops. J. Plant. Pathol., 96(1): 97-103. doi:10.4454/jpp.v9611.029.
27. Navarro-Campos C., Pekas A., Moraza M.L. 2012. Soil-dwelling predatory mites in citrus: their potential as natural enemies of thrips with special reference to Pezothrips kellyanus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Biol. Control., 63: 201-209. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.07.007
28. Navarro-Campos C., Wäckers F.L. Pekas A. 2016. Impact of factitious foods and prey on the oviposition of the predatory mites Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 70(1): 69-78. doi:10.1007/s10493-016-0061-2
29. Nazemi A., Khajehali J., Leeuwen T., Van. 2016. Incidence and characterization of resistance to pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides in Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in onion fields in Isfahan, Iran. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 129: 28-35. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.10.013
30. Pal S., Wahengbam J., Raut A.M., Banu, A.N. 2019. Eco-biology and management of onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. of Entomol. Res., 43 (3): 371-382. doi:10.5958/0974-4576.2019.00066.5
31. Park J., Mostafiz M.D., Hwang H.-S., Jung D.-O., Lee K.-Y. 2021. Comparison of the predation capacities of two soil-dwelling predatory mites, Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae), on three thrips species. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 24(1): 397-401. doi:10.1016/j.aspen.2021.01.009
32. R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ .
33. Riley D.G., Joseph S.V., Srinivasan R., Diffie, S. 2011. Thrips Vectors of Tospoviruses. Jour. of Integ. Pest Manag., 2(1): 1-10. doi:10.1603/IPM10020
34. Rodríguez-Galdón B. Tascón C., Rodríguez E., Díaz C. 2008. Organic acid contents in onion cultivars (Allium cepa L.) J. Agric. Food. Chem., 56: 6512-6519. doi:10.1021/jf800282h
35. Rueda A., Badenes-Pérez F.R., Shelton A.M. 2007. Developing economic thresholds for onion thrips in Honduras. Crop. Prot., 26(8): 1099-1107. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2006.10.002
36. Rueda-Ramírez D., Rios-Malaver D., Varela-Ramirez A., de Moraes G.J. 2018. Colombian population of the mite Gaeolaelaps aculeifer as a predator of the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis and the possible use of an astigmatid mite as its factitious prey. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23(12): 2359-2372. doi:10.11158/saa.23.12.8
37. Rueda-Ramírez D., Rios-Malaver D., Varela-Ramirez A., de Moraes, G.J. 2019. Biology and predation capacity of Parasitus bituberosus (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and free-living nematodes as complementary diet. Pest. Manag. Sci., 75(7):1819-1830. doi:10.1002/ps.5326
38. Rueda-Ramírez D., Varela Ramírez A., Ebratt Ravelo E., de Moraes G. 2021. Edaphic mesostigmatid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) and thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) in rose cultivation and secondary vegetation areas in the Bogotá plateau, Colombia. Int. J. Acarol., 47 (1):8-22. doi:10.1080/01647954.2020.1866666
39. Saito T., Brownbridge M. 2016. Compatibility of soil-dwelling predators and microbial agents and their efficacy in controlling soil-dwelling stages of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. Biol. Control., 92: 92-100. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.10.003
40. Shaikh R.R., Acharya M.F., Rode N.S. 2015. Bionomics of Thrips tabaci Lindeman on onion. J. Exp. Zool., India,18(1): 457-459. ISSN 0972-0030.
41. Smith E.A., Ditommaso A., Fuchs M., Shelton A.M., Nault, B.A. 2011. Weed host for onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and their potential role in the epidemiology of Iris Yellow Spot Virus in an onion ecosystem. Environ. Entomol., 40(2): 194-203. doi:10.1603/EN10246
42. Skirvin D.J. Fenlon J.S. 2001. Plant species modifies the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): implications for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Res., 91(1): 61-67. doi:10.1079/BER200063
43. Srinivasan R., Sundaraj S., Pappu H.R., Diffie, S., Riley, D.G. 2012. Transmission of Iris yellow spot virus by Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 105: 40-47. doi:10.1603/EC11094
44. Szafranek P., Lewandowski M., Kozak M. 2013. Prey preference and life tables of the predatory mite Parasitus bituberosus (Acari: Parasitidae) when offered various prey combinations. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 61(1): 53-67. doi:10.1007/s10493-013-9701-y
45. Tommasini M. G., Maini S. 1995. Frankliniella occidentalis and other thrips harmful to vegetable and ornamental crops in Europe. Wagening. Agric. Univ. Pap., 95(1): 1-42.
46. van Lenteren J.C., Bolckman K., Köhl J. 2018. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 63: 39-59. doi:10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4
47. Waiganjo M.M., Mueke J.M., Gitonga L.M. 2008. Susceptible onion growth stages for selective and economic protection from onion thrips infestation. Acta Hort., 767: 193-200. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.767.19
48. Wiethoff J., Poehling H.M., Meyhoefer R. 2004.Combining plant- and soil-dwelling predatory mites to optimise biological control of thrips. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 34: 239-261. doi:10.1023/B:APPA.0000049137.26697.b9
49. Wu M., Gotoh H., Waters T., Walsh D.B., Lavine L.C. 2014. Identification of an alternative knockdown resistance (kdr)-like mutation, M918L, and a novel mutation, V1010A, in the Thrips tabaci voltage-gated sodium channel gene. Pest. Manag. Sci., 70: 977-981. doi:10.1002/ps.3638
50. Wu S.Y., Gao Y.L., Xu X.N., Wang E.D., Wang Y.J., Lei Z.R. 2014. Evaluation of Stratiolaelaos scimitus and Neoseiulus barkeri for biological control of thrips on greenhouse cucumbers. Biocontrol Sci. Technol., 24: 1110-1121. doi:10.1080/09583157.2014.924478

instructions