1✉ Young Researchers and Elite Club, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran.
2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.
3Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
2017 - Volume: 57 Issue: 4 pages: 847-853DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20174199
Currently, the family Cheyletidae (Acariformes: Cheyletoidea) includes more than 440 species in 75 genera (Zhang et al. 2011; Bochkov 2005). Most of these mites are free-living predators although some are permanent ectoparasites of small mammals and birds (Skoracki et al. 2012; Bochkov and Abramov 2016).
The genus Bak was erected by Yunker (1961), with Bak sanctaehelenae Yunker, 1961 as the type species collected from USA (California). This genus comprises 12 species (Bak ligysculatus Flechtmann, 1971 is nomen nudum because it was described in an unpublished thesis (Fain and Bochkov 2001)). Eleven species are described on the basis of female specimens and only B. nadchatrami is described based on male. Overall, males are described for six species. The genus is distributed in the Nearctic, Neotropical and Oriental regions, where most species inhabit organic debris and only occasionally are found in house dusts (Fain and Bochkov 2001; Bochkov and Otto 2010).
During taxonomic studies of cheyletid mites from northern Iran, a new species of Bak was discovered. Herein, we describe B. iranica n. sp., the first species of Bak recorded from Iran, and provide an identification key to Bak species of the world.
Soil and rotten leaves were taken from Amol county, Mazandaran Province. Mites were extracted by using a Berlese-Tullgren funnel and preserved in AGA solution (Smiley 1992). Specimens were cleared in lactophenol fluid, mounted in Hoyer’s medium (Walter and Krantz 2009), and were examined under a phase contrast microscope (Olympus BX41). Drawings were made with a camera lucida and differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. The body length of specimens was measured from the apex of subcapitulum to posterior margin of idiosoma, the length of the gnathosoma was measured from the base to the tip of the subcapitulum, the width of the body at its broadest level, and the legs from the ventral insertion of coxae to the base of the pretarsi. In the description below, the idiosomal setation follows Grandjean (1939) as adapted for Prostigmata by Kethley (1990). The nomenclature for leg setae follows that of Grandjean (1944). All measurements are given in micrometres (μm). Measurements (range) of paratype are given in brackets following that of holotype.
Type species: Bak sanctaehelenae Yunker, 1961
Diagnosis (male) — Body (including gnathosoma) 407 (371) long, 136 (112) wide; gnathosoma 130 (113) long, 77 (58) wide; propodonotal shield 141 (148) long, 76 (63) wide; median plate 27 (23) long, 17 (12) wide; palp 97 (81) long; palp femur 43 (38) long, 33 (29) wide; dorsal seta on palpal femur (dF) ? (30) long. Length of legs I–IV: 167 (155); 123 (117); 158 (144); 156 (140). Dorsal seta on femur IV (dFIV) 30 (26).
Description. Male (n=2).
Dorsum (Figs. 1A–B, 2A) — Dorsum with a single propodonotal shield and one small weakly sclerotized hysteronotal shield situated posteriorly. Eyes absent. Dorsal setae slightly lanceolate and finely barbed. Propodonotal shield in shape of elongate pentagon with rounded posterior margin, broken longitudinal striae, and bearing five pairs of setae (vi, ve, sci, sce and c1); setae c2 smooth filiform, situated ventrally. Hysteronotum bearing six pairs of setae and unpaired median hysteronotal shield lacking setae. Setae d1, d2, e1 and f1 on small platelets. Setae h1 and h2 smooth filiform and slightly shorter than propodonotal setae. Lengths of dorsal setae: vi 20 (22); ve 13 (12); sci 15 (12); sce 11 (11); c1 14 (12); c2 56 (62); d1 15 (12); d2 13 (13); e1 6 (6); e2 10 (10); f1 5 (5); f2 5 (5); h1 17 (16). Distances between dorsal setae: vi–vi 52 (39); sci–sci 62 (51); c1–c1 62 (51); c1–d1 70 (58); d1–d1 34 (33).
Venter (Fig. 1C) — Ventral surface ornamented with striations; bearing three pairs of setae on small platelets (1a, 3a and 4a). Genitoanal area with one pair of genital setae (g1). All ventral setae smooth and setiform. Lengths of setae: 1a 22 (18); 3a 61 (69); 4a 15 (15); g1 12 (10). Aedeagus located internally; outline visible, fine structure obscured by body.
Gnathosoma (Figs. 2B–C) — Peritremes M-shaped, with 12 pairs of chambers. Rostral shield (tegmen) with one pair of distinct lateral teeth. Gnathosoma bearing subcapitular setae n 54 (63) and adoral setae ao1 6 (5) and ao2 17 (14). Distance between n–n 37 (32). All setae smooth and setiform. Rostrum (protegmen + tegmen) ventrally and dorsally with longitudinal striations. Palp setal formula as follows: trochanter without seta; femur with one smooth seta (dF) (in paratype, Fig. 2B) and one smooth setiform seta (v’) and one stout seta (v”); genu with two smooth setiform setae (dG, l”G); tibia with three smooth and setiform setae (dTi, l’Ti, l”Ti), tibial claw 39 (35) long, strong and with two basal teeth; tarsus with one comb-like eupathidium (sul) with approximately 23 tines, three smooth eupathidia (acm, ul’, ul”) and one solenidion (ω).
Legs (Figs. 2D–G) — All leg setae smooth setiform, excluding lanceolate and serrate setae dF on femora III–IV. Chaetotaxy of legs I–IV: coxae (excluding 1a, 3a and 4a) 2–1–2–1, trochanters 1–1–1–1, femora 2–2–1–1, genua 1(+1σ)–1–1–0, tibiae 4(+1φ)–4(+1φ)–4(+1φ)–4, tarsi 9(+1ω)–7(+1ω)–7(+1ω)– 7(+1ω). Length of solenidia: ωI 10 (10); ωII 9 (9); ωIII 10 (9); ωIV 9 (8); φI 4 (3); φII 9 (10); φIII 10 (10).
Immature stages and female: Unknown.
Remarks — Where both sexes are known, conspecific female and male Bak specimens possess some of the same distinguishing characters, including the shape of dorsal body setae, and chaetotaxy of coxae, trochanters, femora, genua, tibia I and tarsi I–II. We therefore use these characters to distinguish B. iranica, which is known only by male specimens, from other Bak species, half of which are known only by female specimens.
The new species resembles B. faini Corpuz-Raros, 2000 and B. sanctaehelenae Yunker, 1961 in having the same femora and genua chaetotaxy. Bak iranica sp. nov. can be distinguished from B. faini by 1) tarsus I with 9 setae (vs. 8 setae in both sexes); 2) tibia IV without solenidion φ (vs. solenidion φ present in male); and 3) trochanter III with one seta (vs. trochanter III without seta). Bak iranica sp. nov. differs from the males of B. sanctaehelenae by 1) palpal claw with two basal teeth instead of a single tooth; and 2) tibia IV with 4 setae and φ absent instead of 4(+1φ). Furthermore, the new species differs in the shape of dorsal body setae from B. indonesiensis Bochkov and Otto, 2010 as most of dorsal body setae are slightly lanceolate and barbed instead of clavate shape.
Etymology — The specific epithet is derived from the country of origin, Iran.
Type materials — Holotype and paratype males were collected from samples of soil and rotten pine leaves, Haraz road, Polour, Amol county, Mazandaran province, Iran, 11 August 2015 by Saeid Paktinat-Saeij. The holotype male is deposited in the Acarological Collection, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran, and the paratype male is deposited in the Acarological Collection, Jalal Afshar Zoological Museum, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Previously, Fain and Bochkov (2001) established a key based on characters shared by females and males. Other keys are based on females (Gerson and Fain 1991; Corpuz-Raros 2000). However, given the number of species presently known from males, we decided to provide a key for each sex separately.
1. Tibiae II–III without solenidia; inner palp tarsal comb with teeth; without aedeagus
...... female 2
— Tibiae II–III usually with one solenidion; inner palp tarsal comb usually without teeth; with an aedeagus
...... male 12
2. Dorsal setae setiform or lanceolate
— Dorsal setae clavate or bifurcate
3. Femora I–II with one seta each
— Femora I–II with two setae each
4. Genu III nude
...... B. micidus Summers and Price
— Genu III with one seta
...... B. deleoni Yunker
5. Genu II nude
— Genu II with one seta
6. Genu III nude
...... B. ozarkensis Thewke and Enns
— Genu III with one seta
...... B. gersoni Corpuz-Raros
ledeterminationbis7. Genu I with one setaB. truncatus Corpuz-Raros and Sotto
— Genu I with two setae
ledeterminationbis8. Femur III with one seta; tarsus I with 9(+1ω) setaeB. sanctaehelenae Yunker
— Femur III with two setae; tarsus I with 8(+1ω) setae
...... B. payatus Corpuz-Raros and Sotto
9. Trochanter III nude
— Trochanter III with one seta
ledeterminationbis10. Setae vi, ve and sci thickened and serrate, other dorsal setae clavate and plumose B. faini Corpuz-Raros
— Setae vi, ve and sci clavate and plumose like other dorsal setae
...... B. elongatus Diaz-Patxot and Goff
ledeterminationbis11. Dorsal setae bifurcate; tarsus I with 8(+1ω) setaeB. furcatus Gerson and Fainledeterminationbis— Dorsal setae clavate; tarsus I with 9(+1ω) setaeB. indonesiensis Bochkov and Otto
12. Dorsal setae setiform or lanceolate
— Dorsal setae clavate or bifurcate
ledeterminationbis13. Genua II and III nudeB. ozarkensis Thewke and Enns
— Genua II and III each with one seta
14. Femur III with one seta
15. Tibia IV with four setae; palpal claw with two basal teeth
...... B. iranica n. sp.
— Tibia IV with 4(+1φ) setae; palpal claw with one basal tooth
...... B. sanctaehelenae Yunker
ledeterminationbis16. Trochanter III nude; tibia IV with 4(+1φ) setaeB. faini Corpuz-Raros
— Trochanter III with one seta; tibia IV with four setae
ledeterminationbis17. Dorsal setae bifurcateB. furcatus Gerson and Fainledeterminationbis— Dorsal setae clavate, only seta e1 bifurcateB. nadchatrami Fain and Bochkov
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr. Andre Bochkov (Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia) and Dr. Fariba Ardeshir (Department of Zoology, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran) for their advice and literature.
Bochkov A.V., Abramov V.V. 2016 — To fauna of the free-living Cheyletidae (Acariformes: Cheyletoidea) of the European part of Russia — Syst. Appl. Acarol., 21(3): 335-346. doi:10.11158/saa.21.3.8
Bochkov A. 2005 — Synopsis of the described Actinedida of the world. Superfamily Cheyletoidea — In: Hallan J. (Ed.), Synopsis of the Described Arachnida of the World. Available from: ( http://insects.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/acari/Family/Actinedida1.htm ) (accessed 23 November 2011)
Bochkov A.V., Otto J.S. 2010 — Five new species of predaceous cheyletid mites (Acari: Cheyletidae) — Zootaxa, 2727: 1-20.
Corpuz-Raros L.A. 2000 — Two new species and a new record of Bak from the Philippines (Acari: Cheyletidae) — Int. J. Acarol., 26: 321-328. doi:10.1080/01647950008684205
Fain A., Bochkov A.V. 2001 — A review of some cheyletid genera (Acari: Prostigmata) with descriptions of new species — Acarina, 9: 47-95.
Flechtmann C.H.W. 1971 — Alguns Trombidiformes do Brasil e do Paraguai (Acari) — Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de Salo Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil. pp. 63.
Gerson U., Fain A. 1991 — A new species of Bak (Acari: Cheyletidae) from Thailand, with a key to species — Acarologia, 32(1): 17-21.
Grandjean F. 1939 — Les segments post-larvaires de l'hysterosoma chez les oribates (Acariens) — Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr., 64: 273-284.
Grandjean F. 1944 — Observation sur les acariens de la famillie des Stigmaeidae — Arch. Sci. phys. natur., 26: 103-131.
Kethley J. 1990 — Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida) — In: Dindal D.L. (Ed.). Soil Biology Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 667-756.
Smiley R.L. 1992 — The predatory mite family Cunaxidae (Acari) of the world with a new classification — Indira Publishing House, West Bloomington, Michigan. pp. 356.
Skoracki M., Zabludovskaya S.A., Bochkov A.V. 2012 — A review of Prostigmata (Acariformes: Trombidiformes) permanently associated with birds — Acarina, 20(2): 67-107.
Walter D.E., Krantz G.W. 2009 — Collecting, rearing, and preparing specimens — In: Krantz G.W., Walter D.E. (Eds.) A Manual of Acarology. Third edition. Texas Tech University Press. pp. 83-94.
Yunker C.E. 1961 — The genera Bak, new genus, and Cheletomimus Oudemans, with descriptions of three new species (Acarina: Cheyletidae) — Can. Entomol., 93(1): 1023-1035. doi:10.4039/Ent931023-11
Zhang Z.-Q., Fan Q.-H., Pesic V., Smit H., Bochkov A.V., Khaustov A.A., Baker A., Wohltmann A., Wen T.-H, Amrine J.W., Beron P., Lin J.-Z, Gabrys G., Husband R. 2011 — Order Trombidiformes Reuter, 1909. In: Zhang Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness — Zootaxa, 3148: 129-138.