Share this article    

       

       

Description of a new rake legged mite of the genus Allocaeculus (Acariformes: Caeculidae) from Turkey with description of variation in dorsal setation

Per, Sedat1; Dogan, Salih2; Zeytun, Erhan3 and Ayyildiz, Nusret4

1✉ Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey
2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey
3Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey
4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

2017 - Volume: 57 Issue: 2 pages: 369-382

DOI: 10.1051/acarologia/20164162
ZooBank LSID: 1B6D4FC6-6635-4481-ABB0-FCAB2766B56E

Keywords

Acariformes Allocaeculus systematics rediscovery comparison Turkey

Abstract

A new species Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (Acariformes: Caeculidae) is described based on specimens collected from Karanlıkdere Valley, Yozgat, Turkey. Some asymmetries and numerical variations of dorsal body setae of the new species are recorded. A list of the species of this genus is provided. In Turkey, this genus is recorded for the first time.

Introduction

The family Caeculidae (Acariformes: Trombidiformes) is composed of relatively large (1000 – 3000 μm) and strongly sclerotized mites. They are found worldwide in drier habitats and are free-living and usually predaceous (Hagan 1985; Otto 1993; Walter et al. 2009; Taylor et al. 2013; Taylor 2014; Mangová et al. 2014), though laboratory experiments have demonstrated that Caeculus crossleyi Hagan, 1985 successfully feeds and reproduces in cultures containing fungal hyphae (Crossley and Merchant 1971; Hagan 1985).

Adults of Caeculidae characteristically bear eight heavily sclerotized dorsal plates. They are commonly referred as rake-legged mites due to the presence of elongate spine like setae on the legs, particularly the first pair. These spines are used in the capture of small arthropods such as collembolans (Otto 1993; Walter et al. 2009; Taylor et al. 2013; Taylor 2014).

Extensive studies on this family were published by Franz (1952, 1954, 1955, 1957, 1960, 1962, 1964, 1965), Coineau (1967a, b, 1968, 1969a, b, 1974a, b), Coineau and Enns (1969), Coineau and Haupt (1977), Coineau and Magowski (1994), Coineau and Poinar (2001), and a recent list of all species of the family has been provided by Taylor et al. (2013). At the present time, this family consists of about 100 species within seven genera (Hallan 2005; Zhang et al. 2011; Taylor et al. 2013; Mangová et al. 2014). The genus Allocaeculus Franz, 1952 is the most diverse in the family with 34 described species (Table 1). Allocaeculus spp. are easily recognizable by the anterior half of the prodorsal sclerite being extensively neotrichous, unequal tarsal claws of leg I, and by the absence of dorsodistal bothridia bt on legs I and II (Taylor et al. 2013).

Table 1. A list of known species of the genus Allocaeculus Franz, 1952

In this paper, the species Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. from Karanl kdere Valley, Turkey is described. In order to contribute to the knowledge of mites in Turkey, a faunistic study was carried out in Karanl kdere Valley during 2013-2014. We also intend to demonstrate variation in dorsal setation of the new species. Finally a list of species of this genus and the countries where they have been reported is provided.

Materials and methods

Samples obtained from mosses on the rock in Karanl kdere Valley, Yozgat were put in plastic bags. Mites were extracted using a Berlese funnel apparatus in the laboratory. They were preserved in 70 % ethanol, cleared in 50 % lactic acid for a few hours and then mounted on microscope slides in modified Hoyer's medium. All measurements were done with ocular micrometer attached to a compound microscope (Olympus CX21) and given in micrometers (μm). Measurements of the holotype are given first; those of paratypes are in brackets. Specimens studied with SEM were cleaned by soaking in Terg-a-zyme solution for 2 h. After air-drying, samples were glued onto aluminium holders and coated with 180 Ao of AuPd prior to photography. The terminology used is based on Franz (1952) and Mangová et al. (2014).

Family Caeculidae Berlese, 1883

Genus Allocaeculus Franz, 1952

Type species: Allocaeculus relictus Franz, 1952: 111, by original designation.

Diagnosis — Prodorsal plate covers the rostrum wholly or mostly; two pairs of ocelli present on prosoma; idiosoma long oval or rentangular in shape; legs with tridactylous.

Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp.

(Figures 1-9)

ZOOBANK: 91A809D4-94C9-4BD4-90F7-2F73F07D3CDE

Figure 1. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (holotype): A – Dorsal view; B – Ventral view; C – The middle hysterosomal and the lateral plates; D – Epimeral region; E – The first and the second caudal plates; F – Genital and anal region.

Figure 2. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (holotype). Prodorsal plate

Figure 3. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (paratype): A, B – Dorsal view; C – The middle hysterosomal and the lateral plates; D – The first and the second caudal plates; E – Ventral view; F – Genital and anal region.

Figure 4. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (paratype): A – Dorsal view; B – leg I; C – Prodorsal region; D – Dorsal hysterosoma; E – Ventral view; F – Epimeral region; G – Genital region; H – Anal region.

Figure 5. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. Variations in the chaetotaxy: A – Dorsal view of holotype; B-F – Dorsal view of paratypes.

Figure 6. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. Variations in the chaetotaxy: A – Ventral view of holotype; B-F – Ventral view of paratypes.

Figure 7. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (holotype): A – tarsus I, dorsal view; B – Leg I, tibia and metatarsus, dorsal view; C – Leg I, trochanter to genu, dorsal view.

Figure 8. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (holotype): A – Leg II, trochanter to tibia, dorsal view; B – Leg II, metatarsus and tarsus, dorsal view; C – Leg III, trochanter to tibia, dorsal view; D – Leg III, metatarsus and tarsus, dorsal view; E – Leg IV, trochanter to tibia, dorsal view; F – Leg IV, metatarsus and tarsus, dorsal view.

Figure 9. Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp. (holotype): A – Right eyes; B – Broaden seta in caudal plate; C – Broaden seta in the middle hysterosomal plate; D – Clubbed seta in caudal plate; E – Bothridial setae; F – Left pedipalp, ventral view; G – Left pedipalp, dorsal view.

Material examined — Holotype: Adult (♀), from Karanl kdere Valley, Yozgat, Turkey, 844 m, 39°34.762'N, 34°38.902'E, mosses on the rock, 14 September 2013. Paratypes: Five adults (♀), from the same locality as the holotype. The types are deposited in the Acarological collection of the Zoology Museum, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey (Holotype No. BUZM-2016-1, Paratypes No. BUZM-2016-2-6).

Description Female (Holotype) — Length of body 1450 (1350 – 1575), width 850 (810 – 1000). Dorsum with 1 prodorsal and 5 hysterosomal plates. Integument between middle hysterosomal plate and the lateral plates longitudinally wrinkled. Setae Pa present in the anterior of prodorsal plate. The bothridial setae (bo) fusiform, with barbed (Figure 9E). Prodorsal plate bearing 14 pairs of setae (p) (10-14 pairs in the paratypes), first 6 pairs (p1-p6) thickened and arch shaped, 95 in length (Figures 1A, C, 2, 5A).

Two pairs of eyes situated on optical tubercle on prosoma (Figures 1A, C, 9A). Ocular setae absent. Middle hysterosomal plate 630 (510-680) long and 390 (350-480) wide, bearing 8 conic setae (h), (8-12 pairs in the paratypes), about 80 in length. Sixth pair of seta (c1) slightly widened, 95 in length (Figures 1C, 5A). Lateral plates rectangular, 660 long and 170 wide, bearing 18 setae (h'), (Figures 1C, 5A) (ranging in number of seta h' from 14 to 22 in the paratypes). Setae a2 and c2 120 and 135 in length, respectively (Figures 1C, 5A). First caudal plate collapsed in the middle part, ten pairs of setae (k) on the inferior edge (ranging from 9-13 in the paratypes), about 45 in length and third (d3) and eighth (d2) pairs 95 in length (Figures 1E, 5A). Second caudal plate oblong, its inferior edge with 10 setae (k') in left, 11 in right (8-13 in the paratypes), about 45 in length. In left, third (e2) and seventh (e1) pairs, 80 in length. In right, fourth (e2) and ninth (e1) pairs, 80 in length (Figures 1E, 5A).

Venter with 4 coxisternal plates and strongly sclerotized genital and anal plates. Epimeres I and II fused, epimere I with 3 pairs of clubbed setae (c'1, c''1, c'''1), about 60 in length, epimere II with 3 pairs of clubbed setae (c'2, c''2, c'''2), about 35 in length. Epimeres III and IV fused, epimere III with 2 pairs of clubbed setae (c'3, c''3), about 40 in length, epimere IV with three pairs of clubbed setae (c'4, c''4, c'''4), 35 in length. Ten pairs of aggenital setae present, 4 pairs of setiform setae situated on aggenital sclerites; anteriormost pair of clavate aggenital setae ag1 situated close to level of anterior of primere IV; 2 pairs of setiform setae situated directly anterior to aggenital sclerites; 2 pair of setae situated lateral to aggenital sclerites; 1 pair of setae situated posterior to aggenital sclerites. Genital plate length 270 (210-270), width 150 (120-200). Six pairs of setae on genital plate present and about 30 in length. Distance between genital and anal plates 50. Anal plates length 240, width 160. Three pair of setae on anal plate present. Four pairs of adanal setae present, with 3 pairs of setiform setae (v3, v4, v5) on adanal sclerites. One non-conjugated seta v1 situated on posterior margin of ventral hysterosoma (Figures 1B, D, F, 6A).

Pedipalps short and thick, 250 in length. Palptibia three long claws, about 40 in length, Pointed seta s situated anteriorly on palptibia. Palptarsus three short seta o and one pointed seta s. Genu with a long seta r, directed anteriorly. Femur with one clubbed setae q ventrally, 50 in length and three clubbed seta dorsally q 1-q 3 (Figure 9F, G).

Leg I with robust 9 spines and 1500 in length. Leg I ending in 2 tarsal claws (cl), 70 in length. Spines t situated anteriorly on tarsus, and 50 in length. Metatarsus bearing 3 spines (c, c, a) anteriorly (190, 190 and 170 in length, respectively), conic setae m situated anterodorsally (65 in length), posteriorly (80 in length). Tibia with 2 spines (d, c) anteriorly (220 and 170 in length, respectively), setae m situated anterodorsally (60 in length), posteriorly (75 in length), setae t situated anterodorsally (25 in length). Genu bearing 1 spine (b) anteriorly (180 in length), setae m situated posteriorly (85 in length), seta t anterodorsally (15 in length). Femur with 1 spine (b) anteriorly (150 in length), setae m situated posteriorly (95 in length), clubbed seta y situated anterodorsally (90 in length). Trochanter bearing 2 spines (b, b) anteriorly (150 and 140 in length), setae y situated posterodorsally (115 in length), anteroventrally (80 in length), setae m situated posterodorsally (50 in length), posteriorly (45 in length) (Figure 7). Legs II - IV 1125, 1125 and 1150 long, respectively and ending by tarsal claws 40, 50, and 50 long, respectively (Figure 8).

Male and immature stages — Unknown.

Etymology — The name of this new species, turcicus, refers to the country in which it was found.

Differential diagnosis — The new species resembles A. relictus Franz, 1952, A. catalanus Franz, 1954, A. indicus Piffl, 1959 and A. sandbergensis Mangova, Krumpal and Luptacik, 2014 because dorsum has one prodorsal and five hysterosomal plates, and setae c1, e2, e1 are present. The new species differs from A. relictus, A. catalanus, A. indicus and A. sandbergensis by the following features. In the new species, seta a'2 is absent (present in A. catalanus and A. sandbergensis), setae c1 single (double in A. relictus), epimeral setal formula is 3-3-2-3 (4-2-3-3 in A. indicus, 3-2-2-2 in A. sandbergensis), the adanal sclerites bear three pairs of setae each (five pairs in A. relictus, four pairs in A. indicus, one pair in A. sandbergensis), seta v1 present (absent in A. relictus and A. sandbergensis).

Remarks — To date, this family was recorded in Turkey only once and from a single locality (Karaca et al. 2012). Observations showed that this new species has some asymmetry and numerical variations in dorsal body setae. All these cases are summated in Table 2. In the family Caeculidae, variations have been observed by some authors (Enns 1958; Otto 1993; Taylor et al. 2013). Variation in dorsal setation on Neocaeculus imperfectus Taylor, Gunawardene and Kinnear, 2013 was reported by Taylor et al. (2013). They also stated that those variations in ventral and leg setations are common within this species. Detailed discussion of patterns of variation in setation within and between Ceaculid species was provided by Coineau (1974a). The possible reasons of such variation are unknown and its significance for taxonomy not estimated. There are no organisms without variations. Adaptations to different environmental conditions of organisms lead to variations in genetic and phenetic terms. Organisms adapt to environment conditions such as temperature, humidity, amount of nutrients, pH, sunlight and radiation, which can cause genetic and phenetic differentiation and intraspecific variation.

Table 2. Some variations in number of dorsal body setae of Allocaeculus turcicus n. sp.

In the present work we listed the 34 valid species of the genus Allocaeculus and the countries where they have been found (Table 1). Because of absence of specific key for the species of this genus, this check-list will be useful as a first step for the elaboration of such a tool. The first standard key to the species of this genus was developed by Franz (1952) who included 13 species. In the later years (1955) and (1957) he provided the keys for 9 and 10 species respectively, most of them were also included in the previous key. Untill now, no key apart from those has not been elaborated. The recent increase in the number of described species stresses thus the urgency of species key for this genus.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Christopher Taylor, Department of Environment and Agriculture Curtin University, Australia, for reading an earlier draft of the manuscript, to Yves Coineau, Marc De Meyer, Myriam Vandenbosch, Didier Van Den Spiegel and to Veerle Taekels for supplying of some papers. Also we would like to thank the employees of the Technology Research and Developing Centre of Erciyes University for the processing of the SEM photographs of the specimens. This study was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Bozok University, research project no. 2013FEF/A56.

References

Coineau Y. 1967a — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. Contribution a l'etude des Caeculidae. Troisieme serie. Developpement postlarvaire de Neocaeculus luxtoni n. gen., n. sp. — Acarologia, 9: 55-75.

Coineau Y. 1967b — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. IV. Procaeculus bryani Jacot, 1936 (Acariens, Prostigmates) — Pac. Insects, 9: 709-720.

Coineau Y. 1968 — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. 7e série. Microcaeculus franzi n. sp., Caeculidae sabulicole de Corse. Vie et Milieu, Série C — Biologie Terrestre, 19: 143-158.

Coineau Y. 1969a — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. Cinquième série. Procaeculus aitkeni, une nouvelle espèce de Trinidad, B. W. l. — Rev. Ecol. Biol., 6: 53-67.

Coineau Y. 1969b — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. Sixième série. Microcaeculus sabulicola Franz 1952. Redescription, chétotaxie et répartition — Acarologia, 11: 207-221.

Coineau Y. 1974a — Éléments pour une monographie morphologique, écologique et biologique des Caeculidae (Acariens) — Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Série A, Zoologie, 81: 1-299, pls 1-24.

Coineau Y. 1974b — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae. Neuvième partie. Deux nouvelles espèces de Caeculidae de la région Australienne Neocaeculus johnstoni n.sp. et N. womersleyi n.sp. — Vie et Milieu, 24: 65-86.

Coineau Y., Enns W.R. 1969 — Contribution à l'étude des Caeculidae (Acariens, Prostigmates). 8e série. Deux nouvelles espèces d'Australie: Neocaeculus knoepffleri n. sp.; N. bornemisszai n. sp. — Acarologia, 11: 678-696.

Coineau Y., Haupt J. 1977 — Biogéographie, écologie et chétotaxie évolutive a propos des Microcaeculus stephani n. sp. Caeculidae sabulicole (Acari, Actinedida) — Acarologia, 19: 622-632.

Coineau Y., Magowski W.. 1994 — Caeculidae in amber — Acarologia, 35: 243-246.

Coineau Y., Poinar G. 2001 — Un Caeculidae de l'ambre de la République Dominicaine — Acarologia, 41: 141-144.

Crossley D.A., Merchant V.A. 1971 — Feeding by caeculid mites on fungus demonstrated with radioactive tracers — Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 64: 760-762.

Enns W.R. 1958 — A new species of rake-legged mite from Missouri (Acarina, Caeculidae) — J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 31: 107-113.

Franz H. 1952 — Revision der Caeculidae Berlese 1883 (Acari) — Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 3: 91-124.

Franz H. 1954 — Eine weitere neue Allocaeculus-Art nebst Bemerkungen über bekannte Vertreter der Caeculidae (Acari) — Bon. Zool. Beitr., 5: 210-212.

Franz H. 1955 — Dritter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Caeculidae (Acari) — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 95: 9-18.

Franz H. 1957 — Zur Kenntnis der afrikanischen Arten der Gattung Allocaeculus (Acari, Trombidiformes) — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 97: 5-13.

Franz H. 1960 — Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der europäischen und nordafrikanischen Caeculidae (Acari, Trombidiformes) — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 100: 83-87.

Franz H. 1962 — Ein neuer Microcaeculus aus Südamerika. (Acari, Trombidiformes) — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 101-102: 98-100.

Franz H. 1964 — Neue Caeculiden aus Afrika und Südamerika — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 103-104: 82-93.

Franz H. 1965 — 2. Beitrag zur Bodenfauna der Kanarischen Inseln. Caeculiden von Tenerife (Acari, Trombidiformes) — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 105-106: 67-69.

Hagan D.V. 1985 — Caeculus crossleyi n. sp. (Acari: Caeculidae) from granite outcrops in Georgia, U.S.A. — Int. J. Acarol., 11: 241-245. doi:10.1080/01647958508683424

Hallan J. 2005 — Synopsis of the described Actinedida of the world, family Ceaculidae. In: Synopsis of the described Arachnida of the world — Available from: ( http://bug.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/acari/Family/Caeculidae.txt ) (accessed on 10 February 2015).

Karaca M., K z lkaya E., Duran E.H., Urhan R. 2012 — Denizli'de do gal ortamda yeti sen mantar habitatlar ndaki hayvan çe sitlili gi — IX. Türkiye Yemeklik Mantar Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli: p. 82-90. Turkish.

Mangová B., Krumpál M., Luptá cik P. 2014 — Allocaeculus sandbergensis sp. n. (Acari: Caeculidae), a new prostigmatid mite from Slovakia — Biologia, 69: 214-218.

Otto J.C. 1993 — A new species of Microcaeculus from Australia (Acarina: Caeculidae), with notes on its biology and behaviour — Int. J. Acarol., 19: 3-13. doi:10.1080/01647959308683533

Piffl E. 1959 — Allocaeculus indicus, ein neuer Caeculidae aus Pakistan. (Caeculidae, Tromidiformes, Acari) — Frueher: Verh. Zool.-Bot. Wien, Acta ZooBot Austria 52-56.

Taylor C.K. 2014 — Two further Neocaeculus species (Acari: Prostigmata: Caeculidae) from Barrow Island, Western Australia — Acarologia, 54: 347-358.

Taylor C.K., Gunawardene N.R., Kinnear A. 2013 — A new species of Neocaeculus (Acari: Prostigmata: Caeculidae) from Barrow Island, Western Australia, with a checklist of world Caeculidae — Acarologia, 53: 439-452.

Walter D.E., Lindquist E.E., Smith I.M., Cook D.R., Krantz G.W. 2009 — Order Trombidiformes — In: Krantz, G.W. & Walter, D.E. (Eds.), A manual of acarology, 3rd ed. Texas Tech University Press, USA.

Zhang Z.Q., Fan Q.H., Pesic V., Smit H., Bochkov A.V., Khaustov A.A., Baker A., Wohltmann A., Wen T.H., Amrine J.W., Beron P., Lin J.Z., Gabrys G., Husband R. 2011 — Order Trombidiformes Reuter, 1909. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.), Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness — Zootaxa, 3148: 129-138.



Comments
Please read and follow the instructions to post any comment or correction.


Article editorial history

Date received:
2016-06-21
Date accepted:
2016-10-21
Date published:
2017-04-04

Edited by:
Tixier, Marie-Stéphane

(CC BY 4.0)
© 2017 Per, Sedat; Dogan, Salih; Zeytun, Erhan and Ayyildiz, Nusret

Dowloads

 Download full article

Download the citation

RIS with abstract 
(Zotero, Endnote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks, Mendeley)
RIS without abstract 
(Zotero, Endnote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks, Mendeley)
BIB 
(Zotero, BibTeX)
TXT 
(PubMed, Txt)

Article metrics

Number of distinct pdf views
617

Cited by: view citations with